its like comparing Husky to Stihl. Go to Crags list and you'll most likely come across a lot more huskies than stihls. That's my observations anyway.
Ive got a T3 varmit in 223. I must have got the lemon. It will not chamber a cartridge in the 65-85 grain range without catching on something deep inside the receiver/chamber... ironically the twist on this rifle is for something around 75 gr.... it will chamber 55's all day long without issue.. that is if you can get them to come out of the magazine properly. Usually the cartridges get pushed up into a standing position as the bolt moves forward. Ive reduced myself to loading one at a time.. and loading 75gr. cartridges is a real PITA -especially when the rifle is sitting on the vise all zero'ed in. ~sigh~
Why would anyone put a plastic magazine on a rifle action that is mostly Stainless.... ???
Anyone have an idea as to why this wonderfully accurate gun would jam on the prescribed ammunition?
If the tikka is so good, why are there literally dozens for sale here ? Much more than anything else I searched
at least my savage cycles and chambers the way it should.... regardless of which ammunition is used.
So do my T3's.
If I have a Jeffries, I wouldn't even to talking with peasants like us...... is that your SxS in your avatar??
Try a long or medium action bolt stop and mag to match...
The Tikka T3 is definitely a step down from earlier Tikka models.
That being said, your chances of getting an accurate T3 are quite favorable.
I am definitely not a fan of the T3, but acknowledge it's good points. [accuracy, smooth action, etc.]
The stocks are poorly designed for chamberings that deliver a fair bit of recoil, and the plastic magazine leaves
me cold. [they are tough, but expensive and just feel "cheap"]
Plastic bolt shroud is a piece of crap. Trigger guard likewise.
I appreciate many really like them, and more power to the ones that do. I will not be buying any T3's again.
Two was enough for me. [one of these, a 338, was not particularly accurate, BTW.]
Of course, this is my take, YMMV. Regards, Dave.
I know this will more than likely upset a few fans... but, I feel like the t3 is the European savage axis. Am I the only one who feels this way ?
its like comparing Husky to Stihl. Go to Crags list and you'll most likely come across a lot more huskies than stihls. That's my observations anyway.
Ive got a T3 varmit in 223. I must have got the lemon. It will not chamber a cartridge in the 65-85 grain range without catching on something deep inside the receiver/chamber... ironically the twist on this rifle is for something around 75 gr.... it will chamber 55's all day long without issue.. that is if you can get them to come out of the magazine properly. Usually the cartridges get pushed up into a standing position as the bolt moves forward. Ive reduced myself to loading one at a time.. and loading 75gr. cartridges is a real PITA -especially when the rifle is sitting on the vise all zero'ed in. ~sigh~
Why would anyone put a plastic magazine on a rifle action that is mostly Stainless.... ???
Anyone have an idea as to why this wonderfully accurate gun would jam on the prescribed ammunition?
Why is the mag plastic?? Dunno. You're right, it's dumb. Lighter?? Yes. Cheaper to make?? Yes. Cheaper to buy?? Absolutely not.
Why WAS the bolt shroud a plastic POS?? Dunno.
Is it a great rifle for 7-1100$?? Damn rights.
Are you hand loading?? If so, what caliber?? What initials does your mag have on it??
Ah, I see.
Maybe we can do a group buy. I want one too....