Tried again today to get an ATT and got denied. I was hoping that I could get another person on the phone that may be willing to issue one. I told the person that I wanted an ATT to take my firearm from my residence to the Orillia Gun Club. They asked if I had a letter from an executive inviting me to the range and I said I am a member and gave my member number. That wasn't good enough. Somebody from the club has to request the ATT for me. Is this standard procedure all over Ontario? I then asked if I could get just a one time ATT and was denied. So I got a little angry and asked them what would happen if I wanted to take my gun to a gunsmith. They said they could issue a ONE-TIME-ONLY ATT for that purpose.
This is so darn frustrating. I can't get a hold of the one person that can look after applying for the ATT and even when I do it can take up to 5 weeks to get the documents.
Something has to be done about this. I looked into Unauthorized Transport of a Restricted firearm and you can get up to 2 years in jail plus a mandatory firearms prohib.
I just wanna shoot. I really don't understand the reasoning behind needing an ATT. If the regulations for safe transport of a firearm are followed an ATT shouldn't be required. A gun is a gun whether it be a rifle, shotgun or handgun.
I think that the government should have a license endorsement specifically for Transport. so for example a PAL could contain Possession, Acquisition and Transport and perhaps even Carry. That means you could have a single card to show that you can lawfully own, aquire, transport and carry a firearm. It would save us and the government time and money.
Ok, I think my rant is done.
thanks for reading
This is so darn frustrating. I can't get a hold of the one person that can look after applying for the ATT and even when I do it can take up to 5 weeks to get the documents.
Something has to be done about this. I looked into Unauthorized Transport of a Restricted firearm and you can get up to 2 years in jail plus a mandatory firearms prohib.
I just wanna shoot. I really don't understand the reasoning behind needing an ATT. If the regulations for safe transport of a firearm are followed an ATT shouldn't be required. A gun is a gun whether it be a rifle, shotgun or handgun.
I think that the government should have a license endorsement specifically for Transport. so for example a PAL could contain Possession, Acquisition and Transport and perhaps even Carry. That means you could have a single card to show that you can lawfully own, aquire, transport and carry a firearm. It would save us and the government time and money.
Ok, I think my rant is done.
thanks for reading


















































