I purchased a couple of Mauser C96 Conehammers in the U.S. and I’m having difficulties getting antique status letters for them. The guns have serial numbers in the 5### and 6### ranges, which I thought were a no-brainer for antique status.
The RCMP firearms people are asking for proof as to their manufacture date. I gave reference to a few web sites as well as an excerpt from the“Blue Book of Gun Values”, but they rejected this as evidence. They said that production of the Mauser C96 pistols reached high 1,000 (1800-1900) in the autumn of 1897 and production then skipped to 4,000. Later in the year 1897 or beginning 1898 the Mauser firm skipped again in the 10,000 - 12,000 range and then reverted back to the 6,000, 7,000, 8,000 later in the year (but which year, 1897 or 1898??). I believe they are getting this, still undefinitive either way, information from the book “The Mauser Self-Loading Pistol” by Belford and Dunlap, which I have a copy of. I also have the books “The Broomhandle Pistol 1896-1936” by Erickson and Pate, and “System Mauser” by Breathead and Schroeder. Unfortunately none of these books give any facts or even opinions to support my case. I was under the impression from people “in the know” that they may sign off on guns in serial 0-2000, and 4000-7700. In this case they are not willing to do so.
Does anyone out there have any evidence to forward them that will help my cause? I’m pretty sure they’ve given antique status letters to conehammers in these serial ranges in the past. Has anyone out there been issued antique status letters for conehammers in these serial number ranges? I will pay a nice consultation fee to anyone who can provide evidence that results in my getting antiques status letters for these two conehammers. Are there any conehammer experts out there?
The RCMP firearms people are asking for proof as to their manufacture date. I gave reference to a few web sites as well as an excerpt from the“Blue Book of Gun Values”, but they rejected this as evidence. They said that production of the Mauser C96 pistols reached high 1,000 (1800-1900) in the autumn of 1897 and production then skipped to 4,000. Later in the year 1897 or beginning 1898 the Mauser firm skipped again in the 10,000 - 12,000 range and then reverted back to the 6,000, 7,000, 8,000 later in the year (but which year, 1897 or 1898??). I believe they are getting this, still undefinitive either way, information from the book “The Mauser Self-Loading Pistol” by Belford and Dunlap, which I have a copy of. I also have the books “The Broomhandle Pistol 1896-1936” by Erickson and Pate, and “System Mauser” by Breathead and Schroeder. Unfortunately none of these books give any facts or even opinions to support my case. I was under the impression from people “in the know” that they may sign off on guns in serial 0-2000, and 4000-7700. In this case they are not willing to do so.
Does anyone out there have any evidence to forward them that will help my cause? I’m pretty sure they’ve given antique status letters to conehammers in these serial ranges in the past. Has anyone out there been issued antique status letters for conehammers in these serial number ranges? I will pay a nice consultation fee to anyone who can provide evidence that results in my getting antiques status letters for these two conehammers. Are there any conehammer experts out there?


















































