It really REALLY depends on what powder you use. Ball, or flattened-ball powders - I bet'cha you'd see very little difference between a charge thrower or trickling them individually. Even Trail Boss, which are big rounded flakes with holes in them; the charge thrower on the LnL has no trouble cutting them in half if they "don't quite fit". Rod powders though - they can bring the LnL charge thrower to a slamming dead-stop; and if you try forcing them, remember that the case mouth is what's passing the ram's force to the thrower, and the thrower can collapse cases (says the voice of experience...) Ball powders though, the charge thrower ignores them.
I'm curious, has anyone done any testing to see what differences in precision might be attributed to the use of progressives and/or turret presses versus a single stage. I think this would be easy to do - just load up 10 of your accuracy loads on each press and shoot for group.
I can give you one example from personal experience: on my progressive press (Hornady LnL), the seating depth of the bullet varies by about 0.005" depending on whether there is just one case on the shell plate or there is a full set of cases in every positions. By definition, this variance cannot happen on a single-stage press (turret or not). I use ball powders (CFE Pistol and H110 at this time) and my balance scale tells me the charges thrown are identical within at 0.1gr.
If you are going to load a bunch of pistol get a progressive. I am loading 9mm on a single stage and it sucks. An hour to load 100-150 rounds and 15 min to shoot them. I do however use a single stage for all rifle and wouldn't consider a progressive for rifle loading.
A progressive is definitely nice for pistol, but with a good single stage setup, you can crank out over 200/hour. I'm lucky enough to have access to 2 single stage presses, so when reloading rifle or pistol rounds, I can do 2 stages back to back for my lot of ammunition (i.e. resize and expand pistol brass, or seat and factory crimp rifle rounds, and combined with a good powder dispenser, you get fairly fast).
A progressive is definitely nice for pistol, but with a good single stage setup, you can crank out over 200/hour. I'm lucky enough to have access to 2 single stage presses, so when reloading rifle or pistol rounds, I can do 2 stages back to back for my lot of ammunition (i.e. resize and expand pistol brass, or seat and factory crimp rifle rounds, and combined with a good powder dispenser, you get fairly fast).
200 per Hour on a single stage!!! You must have the reflexes of a mongoose. I would bet the average person would get more like 100 per hour. Lee Precision quotes production rates for their turret press as 250 per hour, and that is quite accurate in my experience. On my Pro 1000 progressive, I average about 350 per hour.
I have 2 single stage presses set up next to each other, so I can resize and run through the expander die back to back, then prime and use my powder dispenser, then seat/crimp. I timed myself and going from primed brass, I can dispense my powder charge and seat/crimp 9 rounds/minute when I get in to my groove. This means in about 30 min (including setup), from prepped/primed brass, I can do my 200 rounds. I also tend to do things in large batches. For example, I may spend a few weeks preparing 500 brass, then spend an evening doing all my loading. I use a hand priming tool so I'll usually do that while watching a movie or something. I also prefer the hand priming tool because I can feel when the primer gets to the right depth.
Oh, so you are not including the time to resize and prime the brass. That would explain the times. Normally the time to do those functions would be included in the "rounds per hour" . Including that time would bring your production rate down to 100+ per hour, which would be more normal for single stage.
I have seen other reloaders not include the time to prime cases when quoting production on progressive presses as well. But it offers a skewed picture of realistic production rates for newbies that are just getting started, and/or just choosing equipment. Not that one way is right or wrong, but just to make sure we are talking apples and apples.
All that aside, there is no doubt a reloader can make a fair amount of ammo with a single stage with enough patience and determination. Keep cranking em out.
Yes, for those volumes of 38, a progressive is probably overkill. Nice to have, but certainly not necessarily.No, I'm including that. It only takes me about half an hour to do all those as well.
I don't shoot too much .38, maybe 2000 rounds a year, so going to a progressive just for that doesn't make much sense for me. I can get 9mm really cheap through work (only $6/100 more than reloading), so cranking out those, even on a progressive, would only be of marginal savings. For my .223/308, I want as much precision as possible as I load either Hornady A-max/HPBT or SMK's, and I prefer to use Varget so it doesn't meter very well from a volumetric dispenser.
Yes, for those volumes of 38, a progressive is probably overkill. Nice to have, but certainly not necessarily.
I'm a big Varget user myself. A cheap solution to getting it (and other course powders) to meter well is the new Lee Rotary Powder Measure. I think they are only $55 or so, and do really well with Varget. I still use my RCBS Charge master when I want more precision, but the rotary measure is impressive. Saw some tests of it against much more expensive measures, and it was by far the most accurate with course powders. Really has helped speed up a lot of my reloading.
I do like the electronic powder dispensers. I have a Lyman Gen 6 one myself, cuts a lot of time off measuring charges, and is quite precise. I also have a Lyman Model 55 powder measure.
I just checked my timing on loading the pistol cartridges, did 100 from once fired brass to fully loaded in about 40 mins, and this includes setup and tear down time, and they were polished in a media tumbler (tumble time not included). When doing larger batches, you save 5-10 minutes for setup/die swap, so I was pretty close on my 200/hour estimate.
That's really fast. I don't possess the greatest manual dexterity, so couldn't come close to that. You've obviously been successful at refining your movements to optimize your production rate. Pretty impressive.
Do you think you could maintain that speed over a couple of hours? Not that you would need to, but I'm just wondering if that speed would be too exhausting in an extended setting?