.

I think I am going to run up the Flag on this one. In Post #12, I asked the question "Is this guy real or is he a Troll attempting to get a rise out of people" After reading the posts here, I am leaning toward the latter.
In Post #1, the OP asks a question that is guaranteed to cause some spirited answers from the Members of this Forum.
In Post # 4, GRANTMAC asks what type of ammunition the OP is using.
In Post #17, the OP says the ammo sounds like it is suppressed.
After a few more posts, in Post #33, the OP says that he used a drill bit on his barrel.
In Post #39, the OP says the rifle was "built to shoot quietly so his wife and kids doesnt get too scared of the sound."
The above posts lead anyone with experience to conclude that the OP was trying to shoot sub-sonic ammunition through his rifle. Sub-sonic ammunition tends to be loaded a bit lighter so that the velocity does not exceed the speed of sound. This ammunition may, or may not function in semi-automatic rifles. If there is not enough energy to drive the bolt fully back, so that it ejects the empty case and goes back far enough to pick up and chamber the next round in the magazine, it will cause jamming. This is a typical "short stroke" scenario.
In Post #40, RYAN 500 asks "What types of ammo did you try." The OP, in Post # 43 replies, "I tried mostly federals and blazers." Blazers are known for being a bit "dirty" in semi-automatic rifles.
In Post #45, NAVYSHOOTER makes a Satyric Post suggesting really reaming out the barrel and using Ramset cartridges, for which the OP calls him a "Troll," and in Post #46, the OP suggests that the OP is an Engineer and knows what he is doing.
Post # 61 --The OP states "for this particular gun, I use mostly subsonic ammo. Hmmmm! What happened to the Federals and Blazers?
Sorry, but I do not buy the "Engineer" bit. What Engineer would say that a "chamber is too narrow?" Undersized should be the word when dealing with the diameter of a hole. Too many inconsistencies in this thread.
On the other hand, it has many characteristics of a TROLL THREAD. A contraversial subject designed to raise a lot of comments, and one trying to get someone to blow his temper and say something stupid. The OP continues to argue in an attempt to keep this Thread alive, and continues to "Bait" the other Members. And, he is inconsistent in his answers, especially the types of Ammunition he "Mostly" uses.
I think we can all see where this thread is headed. Perhaps the best thing to do is simply ignore this one, and not give the OP the satisfaction or enjoyment of seeing our blood pressures raised. We can go back to giving those worthwhile people who really do have genuine problems some useful and sane advice, and let out little "Engineer" go back to playing with his model trains.
