Versamax tactical for 3gun

toebako

Regular
Rating - 100%
82   0   0
Location
Alberta
I just picked one up. can I put a 3.5" chambered barrel on this gun? I hear it's the same as the hunting model but I see the bolt for the tac is different than the standard, and cheaper to buy. Did they make a special 3" gun for the Tac version?
 
Welp I posted a rant last week about the very same issue. After research, the versamax tactical is a 3.5" gun but it is NOT marked on the receiver or the barrel. The FRT lists the versamax tactical as a 12 x 3" gun, capacity 5 rounds (this is the lab's opinion and not necessarily law, but you bet the crown is gonna call them and get them to screw you if you're charged). If you ask Remington yourself, they will say it's a 3.5" gun, the receiver is 3.5" and the barrel is also 3.5" chambering. If you look at the receiver and bolt, there is no way to tell the difference between a sportsman or a tactical.

So if you took a tactical receiver and stick a 26 inch barrel marked 3.5" on it, the gun can run 5 x 3.5" shells with no grey area

In my opinion and not legal advice, if you're shooting at a club for a match, people know that a versamax is a 3.5 inch gun, run it as you see fit. If you're out in the boonies, and the risk of LEO intervention is high, run it plugged to 5 x 3" shells.

I just picked one up. can I put a 3.5" chambered barrel on this gun? I hear it's the same as the hunting model but I see the bolt for the tac is different than the standard, and cheaper to buy. Did they make a special 3" gun for the Tac version?
 
Last edited:
Is it legal to mark the barrel to say 3.5"?

I don't think that would hold up too well in court.

I think it would need to be labelled as 3.5" from the factory for you to have a leg to stand on.
 
I think it all comes up to who can present the evidence "what the type of ammunition the firearm was designed for" the best.
If you can come up with a witness who is a gunsmith from Remington, who will testify that the versamax tactical is a 3.5" gun then I think you might have more credibility than some guy from the RCMP lab.
Though if the crown cross-examines your witness and asks, "why didn't your company stamp 3.5' on the barrel" better make sure your witness says the right thing.
There is a common theory out there, but I won't list it here for some NWEST guy to collect.

Also, I don't think that it'll be illegal to stamp the barrel 3.5" if a qualified gunsmith makes that determination. There's no law that says that it's illegal. It's like saying I have an existing 223 barrel, and I'm reaming it out to 22-250, thus my gunsmith makes the correct marking for the new caliber.

I don't think that would hold up too well in court.

I think it would need to be labelled as 3.5" from the factory for you to have a leg to stand on.
 
I just picked one up. can I put a 3.5" chambered barrel on this gun? I hear it's the same as the hunting model but I see the bolt for the tac is different than the standard, and cheaper to buy. Did they make a special 3" gun for the Tac version?

The existing barrel is suitable for 2 3/4 to 3 1/2. The stated mag capacity is listed for 2 3/4 and 3 shells. All versmax barreles are listed as 3 1/2 except maybe for the " field deer barrel"

Do you have any information to the contrary?
 
The existing barrel is suitable for 2 3/4 to 3 1/2. The stated mag capacity is listed for 2 3/4 and 3 shells. All versmax barreles are listed as 3 1/2 except maybe for the " field deer barrel"

Do you have any information to the contrary?

I have been told they have 3.5" chambers so would run 3.5" shells. I see no need to pin it otherwise. I guess if i need to prove it will shoot 3.5" in court it takes a measuring tape and some ammo to seal the deal.
 
The existing barrel is suitable for 2 3/4 to 3 1/2. The stated mag capacity is listed for 2 3/4 and 3 shells. All versmax barreles are listed as 3 1/2 except maybe for the " field deer barrel"

Do you have any information to the contrary?

It's not stamped 3 1/2 on the barrel like the other versamax versions. Hence the bull####.
 
How many rounds does it fit pinned to 5 3 inchers? I was looking at the tactical model because I don't want to spend a lot of cash making a gun suitable if I can get one off the shelf. Like buying a scope feel the pain once. Any other semi options under 1500?
 
How many rounds does it fit pinned to 5 3 inchers? I was looking at the tactical model because I don't want to spend a lot of cash making a gun suitable if I can get one off the shelf. Like buying a scope feel the pain once. Any other semi options under 1500?

I can get 5 2-3/4" shells in. I have not tried 3" shells but assume 5 will be very tight
 
Did you take out that washer on the magtube extension and repin? they put it in there so that they could import it pass CBSA, but it's not plugged properly.

No washer in mine. Nordic extension with a crimp all the way around at what looks like +1 position. I now have a +3 Nordic for it and it should fit 5 1/2 3.5" shells. I have to prove this out and pin/bolt/plug as needed. The total tube length should be about 20". This should give me enough for the spring and follower and 7 2-3/4" shells. If my guesswork is good.
 
5 x 3 inchers would fit 6 x 2.75

Stoeger m3k, comes with the proper lifter and enlarged feed port. sub 800 bucks

You can fit 5.9 3 inchers for a total of 17.7 inches, or 6.4 2.75 inch shells. If your shotgun can shoot 5.9 of the 3.5 inchers, you get 7.5 2.75 inchers
 
You can fit 5.9 3 inchers for a total of 17.7 inches, or 6.4 2.75 inch shells. If your shotgun can shoot 5.9 of the 3.5 inchers, you get 7.5 2.75 inchers

Thats the idea. I measured some 2 3/4" shells and they are 2 1/4" long. Must be 2 3/4 long when fired. Throws the calculations out. I can now get my 7 in the tube and the gun works great with 3.5" shells.
 
Back
Top Bottom