To the OP, no scope is unbreakable.Who told you they were unbreakable? Vortex has a fairly high warranty claim rate, especially on their lower end lines like Viper and down.
Doesn't sound like they will be in business much longer at a 50% failure rate. Are you talking about bottom end Crossfire or top end Razor? How many guys is 50% ? Just asking because I don't want to waste my cash.Vortex is a very good value for dollar spent, and they have a warranty that is pretty much the best in the biz.
About 50% of the guys I know who have actually purchased and used vortex scopes have had to utilize the warranty.... They always make good in relatively short time frames (6 weeks was the average).
Okay, so what did you end up buying?Read the forums, constant failures with Vortex. Canted reticles, failed illumination, poor tracking, debris on the glass, etc etc. Many people having had sent the same scope back multiple times and have it fail time and again. Thats where I got that info from. If you don't want to believe it that's not my problem. I stopped buying Vortex after being disappointed with every purchase, finding better value in the price range and similar quality from less expensive options. But I'm big into reliability and performance so I don't put up with cheap stuff like some people can. Its6your money and your guns. My money doesn't go to Vortex and Vortex doesn't go on my guns.
Okay, so what did you end up buying?
So how does the Votex Razor line compare to the Bushnell DMR 3.5-21X50? There appears to be some issues with the lower end Vortex scopes but what about the Vipers & Razor line?For red dots I much prefer the Aimpoint PRO and H1. As for LR optics I use Nightforce and this year I started using the Bushnell DMR 3.5-21X50. The only reasons for the transition from NF to Bushy for me was the reticle/turret combination (mil/mil vs mil/moa on the NF) and wanting to get into FFP with a reticle better suited to FFP use than the mildot my NF used. The new high end Bushnells are doing very well with PRS shooters with a few aspects comparing well with NF and clearly taking a beating that PRS matches are known for. I was not disappointed as I find the glass comparable, tracking has been excellent and the G2DMR reticle is working well for me. I bought it on sale for about the price of a Vortex FFP scope but typical retail is closer to NF prices of a few years ago.
So how does the Votex Razor line compare to the Bushnell DMR 3.5-21X50? There appears to be some issues with the lower end Vortex scopes but what about the Vipers & Razor line?
To the OP, no scope is unbreakable.
SN: From where did you get this information? I have a bottom end Vortex Crossfire and nary an issue. But I am looking to upgrade to a Vortex Viper or Sightron SII.
Doesn't sound like they will be in business much longer at a 50% failure rate. Are you talking about bottom end Crossfire or top end Razor? How many guys is 50% ? Just asking because I don't want to waste my cash.
To the OP, no scope is unbreakable.
SN: From where did you get this information? I have a bottom end Vortex Crossfire and nary an issue. But I am looking to upgrade to a Vortex Viper or Sightron SII.
Doesn't sound like they will be in business much longer at a 50% failure rate. Are you talking about bottom end Crossfire or top end Razor? How many guys is 50% ? Just asking because I don't want to waste my cash.