Wanstall's finally responds;

Status
Not open for further replies.
Thats a nice theory. My theory is that there was a big misunderstanding on the exchange rate: they were posting the USA price by mistake. They were quoted a US dealer price, thought it was CDN $$$ and posted the presale in CDN dollars.

At this point if they were smart they would have stuck to their word and take a loss. Instead they are playing the 'short game'. Whoever is reponsible at Wanstalls should probably be sent packing. Unless its the owner I guess.

Why M&M would tell wanstalls they would supply them with rifles and then reneg, who knows? Maybe they didnt. Canam seemed to get the short end of the stick on this one.

All people want is for folks to do what they said they would do, they are right to be pissed.

M+M said on Facebook that wanstalls would be able to fufill the pre order. There was no misunderstanding about price. M+M changed the price, and how they were going about distributing the gun for some reason. That reason is assumed to be NS offering more money for exclusive rights to the gun.

Now wanstalls can't get the guns directly from m+m, which was what they expected to be able to do. Instead they have to go through NS, and between NS'S cut and their NR tax, it's gone up 35% in price.
 
They also stated that Wanstalls posted the preorder without consulting with them at all about price.
Wanstalls jumped the gun.
M&M also pulled the rug out by not supplying Wanstalls.
Everyone needs to learn how to draft contracts.
 
You keyboard warriors initiating negative feedback realize they can leave you negative feedback now right?

Are you sure you want to poke the CGN bear? Because you three will get banned well before Wanstalls, a paying forum sponsor gets anything negative happening.

Their stick is bigger. Food for thought.
 
Now wanstalls can't get the guns directly from m+m, which was what they expected to be able to do. Instead they have to go through NS, and between NS'S cut and their NR tax, it's gone up 35% in price.

Here's the thing that was fishy about Wanstalls price right from the start. It was below the US msrp. Why has no one mentioned this?The presale price was always too good to be true. Take the USA msrp, convert it to Canadian funds. Then factor in shipping,brokerage and some other expenses. Right at the start of this fiasco, I predicted a Cdn street price of $1950. Turns out that was off by $50. And this was well before any change in US msrp.

So, how did Wanstalls secure the rifles at a major discount? They didnt in my opinion. They posted the wrong price from the get go.
 
Keep in mind guys that Canam was 2 years ahead on all this BS. They were predicting a price of $2000-2400 based on talks with M&m. About a year ago. Look it up in their thread.

No one raised the price or added a NR tax. The $1450 was a bullshiate price from the start.
You can all hate on NS if you want, but they dominate the supply chain. Makes sense that M&m would choose the biggest supplier.

If Wanstalls had not jumped in with incorrect pricing, none of this would have happened.

People were actually blaming canam for trying to gouge people. Gimme a break.
 
This fits NS's MO to a tee. Let someone else do the work, step in and buy the business from the producer with the customer's money. They've done it before, they've done it this time, and they'll do it again. Yet everyone seems surprised, and they're blaming Wanstall's. Weird.
 
Nobody (that I see) is blaming Wanstaĺls for anything other than promising a piece of merchandise and then failing to deliver. Which is precisely what they did. I am willing to cut Wanstalls a bit of slack because they were (apparently) screwed over too, but that's the extent of my sympathy. This was a customer relations boondoggle from the outset. Probably short-lived, but the pre-sale cancellation was a significant annoyance for some folks who believe that a deal is a deal once money changes hands. That's it, that's all. Hardly the end of the world...
 
You keyboard warriors initiating negative feedback realize they can leave you negative feedback now right?

Are you sure you want to poke the CGN bear? Because you three will get banned well before Wanstalls, a paying forum sponsor gets anything negative happening.

Their stick is bigger. Food for thought.

I haven't seen anything in the public feedback comments that isn't true. I took the time to offer my detailed thoughts to Wanstalls in the private comments and I welcome a dialogue if they want one. Aside from that, I've said my piece and am ready to move on.

What's the point of feedback if it is not honest? I'm sure the folks at Wanstalls can handle a bit of constructive criticism. And what makes you think that CGN will take punitive action against bonafide feedback? I'd be surprised by that, but hey - I've been wrong before!
 
You keyboard warriors initiating negative feedback realize they can leave you negative feedback now right?

Are you sure you want to poke the CGN bear? Because you three will get banned well before Wanstalls, a paying forum sponsor gets anything negative happening.

Their stick is bigger. Food for thought.
Leave negative feedback for leaving negative feedback? Like an 8 year old? What did the preorder people do to deserve negative feedback?
 
You keyboard warriors initiating negative feedback realize they can leave you negative feedback now right?

Are you sure you want to poke the CGN bear? Because you three will get banned well before Wanstalls, a paying forum sponsor gets anything negative happening.

Their stick is bigger. Food for thought.

Actually they can not leave negative feedback just because you left if for them. There are rules about that.

Wanstalls messed up and put out a pre-sale price and took peoples money for a product they had not secured, then when M+M told them they were not getting them for said price both M+M and Wanstalls told the people on the pre-sale list that they would still get their rifles for the promised price, then M+M went with NS forcing Wanstalls to retract their promise to deliver for the agreed upon price.
To me even though Wanstalls really had no choice other than to take a loss on each rifle (which wouldn't have actually been very much money per unit) this is easily grounds for negative feedback, I don't think guys are out of line leaving negative even though in this situation the only one I'd like to see get anything negative is M+M. Unfortunately they will still profit because there are people out there that will still support them and NS by buying one of these rifles regardless of what douchebags M+M and NS are.
I wouldn't buy one of these even if it was $1000. To me the ethics of the manufacturer tells me something about their product. Think about it this way, if you worked for a doucher like the owner of M+M would you give a crap about the quality of the product you are assembling for him? Would you take the extra time to make it perfect or would you do just enough to get to the end of the day and go home? I know that most people who don't like their job do a half ass job of it compared to someone who enjoys their job and takes pride in what they are doing. If I had to guess I would say these will all be friday afternoon rifles.

What happened here is why I refuse to do any pre-sales, until I can physically see a product on a retailers shelf I can wait. I don't need to be the first one to own something and I have plenty of other NR semi autos to keep me busy while I wait.
If these are such great rifles why aren't they selling in the US? M+M said they told their investors they would jack the price on rifles exported to Canada to supplement low sales in the US. Maybe the Americans know something we don't, I'm going to guess that they aren't all that impressed with them, if they were as good as M+M claims they are then they would be selling and they wouldn't need to make a modified version for Canada. Instead they have low sales and are selling for below MSRP like dealers just want to get rid of them. We may have actually dodged a bullet thanks to M+M's garbage, better than being stuck with a turd.

In the end, quit your crying, you get a full refund or a store credit + 10% off your next purchase. You are out nothing other than a bit of an emotional let down. If you went out and bought a bunch of accessories then that's your problem and no one else's.
AK mags? So what, they're easy to sell and there are other rifles out there that can use them.
A scope? Put it on another rifle, sell it, or return it for refund.

Hopefully we all learn something from this and hopefully our retailers do as well. I would like to see an end to all this pre-sale garbage. Are we really so desperate for a rifle we don't need and can easily live without that we're reduced to a bunch of crying spoiled children when we don't get what we want? You put $250 down on a $1500 rifle, big deal, get over it. This was a cheap entry level black rifle shooting x39 not a $7000 precision target rifle. There will be more rifles like it coming in the future, there always are.
Time will tell if I buy from Wanstalls again, how they move forward from this will help me decide. I've always had positive experiences with them in the past and even though they screwed up on this one I'm not going to condemn them for a mistake that didn't end up costing anyone anything. It's not like they sent in a sample of an already NR rifle to the RCMP in order to try to sink their competition and ended up getting the rifle moved to the prohib list. For that there is no forgiving, for this screw up time should heal all wounds.
 
Last edited:
They ####ed up and now they are putting all the blame solely on Mickey Mouse ;). Nothing about sorry we ####ed up. Well sell you the rifle at 1600$ and we'll take a loss. So yeah they should bare some of the blame. Interesting the refund option is last ;)

They said sorry your in the wrong thread.It may be locked but it's there.I saw it
 
You keyboard warriors initiating negative feedback realize they can leave you negative feedback now right?

Are you sure you want to poke the CGN bear? Because you three will get banned well before Wanstalls, a paying forum sponsor gets anything negative happening.

Their stick is bigger. Food for thought.

Seriously, It's not your business. I hate your liberal mindset. BE RESPONSIBLE !!!!

View attachment 126546
 
Last edited:
Only 10% after all this drama? It should be more!!!

2) You can transfer your deposit to store credit – with an additional 10% discounted rate towards your next purchase of any in store products.
 
Nobody (that I see) is blaming Wanstaĺls for anything other than promising a piece of merchandise and then failing to deliver. Which is precisely what they did. I am willing to cut Wanstalls a bit of slack because they were (apparently) screwed over too, but that's the extent of my sympathy. This was a customer relations boondoggle from the outset. Probably short-lived, but the pre-sale cancellation was a significant annoyance for some folks who believe that a deal is a deal once money changes hands. That's it, that's all. Hardly the end of the world...

Quite a few who preordered are blaming Wanstalls not taking a loss and fulfill the preorders. Especially the guy who had 2 preordered and ordered a bunch AK mags from IRG
 
Last edited:
Quite a few who preordered are blaming Wanstalls or taking a loss and fulfill the preorders. Especially the guy who had 2 preordered and ordered a bunch AK mags from IRG

I bought stuff mag , scope, Certainly after Wanstall confirmed two time they will honor their sale ! And I'm not alone in this case.
 
Quite a few who preordered are blaming Wanstalls or taking a loss and fulfill the preorders. Especially the guy who had 2 preordered and ordered a bunch AK mags from IRG
I’d be quite a bit more pissed if I had ordered mags and an optic for this rifle. What a pain in the a$$. You can’t fault people for doing it either. It’s a reasonable thing to do when you’ve been reassured over and over again.
I get a kick out of these guys who try and take the extra high road with “why would you order mags for something you didn’t possess with your own two hands” or “just send them back, not the end of the world”
 
I’d be quite a bit more pissed if I had ordered mags and an optic for this rifle. What a pain in the a$$. You can’t fault people for doing it either. It’s a reasonable thing to do when you’ve been reassured over and over again.
I get a kick out of these guys who try and take the extra high road with “why would you order mags for something you didn’t possess with your own two hands” or “just send them back, not the end of the world”

I guess I would too be pissed at the dealer if I had high hopes and suddenly it was smashed. Like many people have said.. reputation takes years to build but can be tarnished in just in a few seconds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom