Here's the thing that was fishy about Wanstalls price right from the start. It was below the US msrp. Why has no one mentioned this?The presale price was always too good to be true. Take the USA msrp, convert it to Canadian funds. Then factor in shipping,brokerage and some other expenses. Right at the start of this fiasco, I predicted a Cdn street price of $1950. Turns out that was off by $50. And this was well before any change in US msrp.
So, how did Wanstalls secure the rifles at a major discount? They didnt in my opinion. They posted the wrong price from the get go.
And you expect to be compensated ?
lol
M+M told wanstalls a price for the gun, bought by wanstalls directly from them. With that info, wanstalls set up a pre order, factoring in an appropriate markup for themselves. There is no way wanstalls would just make up a price, that makes zero sense.
M+M then said they had not decided on a Canadian MSRP, but wanstalls would be able to honor the presale.
Then m+m changed their minds on their distribution plans, throwing wanstalls under the bus in the process.
MSRP is just that, a suggested price. Very few things sell for msrp, and dealers don't pay msrp either. Msrp includes a cut for everyone involved in selling the rifle (manufacturer, dealer, distributor). Also, US guns get hit with an 11% excise tax we don't pay which would be in the US msrp.
CanAm suggested $2000-2400 months if not years ago. They also told us the reason it was so high is m+m promised US investors they would jack up international prices to subsidize US sales.
As a comparison, a savage axis has a US msrp of $368, and can be had for $450cad at most (and they can be had on sale for less than the US msrp) That's only a 22% increase.
What’s funny about that? He will be compensated. 10% off if he wants. I guess Wanstalls thinks he should be compensated too. Is that funny? What is your point? Other than being an a$$?And you expect to be compensated ?
lol
Seriously, It's not your business. I hate your liberal mindset. BE RESPONSIBLE !!!!
View attachment 126546
Sorry but , you just speculate about the facts in your imagination.
Lol @ liberal mindset.
Little boy, you don't know me. I'm the farthest thing from.
I have COMMON SENSE.
I think I will watch this play out. May you fade to pink quickly.
So tell me what is your side of imagination then. Lol.
Detailed feedback left for Wanstall's. Not that it wiĺl change anything at this point, but hopefully a lesson has been learned about counting chickens...
Only 10% after all this drama? It should be more!!!
2) You can transfer your deposit to store credit – with an additional 10% discounted rate towards your next purchase of any in store products.
Why should it be more? The only people that created drama was us being impatient, it was a few days of wondering what was going on for something that in the big picture means nothing and affects no one in a negative way. You didn't have one before and you still don't have one. What did you lose after all was said and done? Nothing, you get your $250 back and can move on in life. Adding the 10% off your next purchase if you roll the $250 to store credit was more than they had to do. These are the risks you take jumping into a pre-order for a rifle that hasn't even been manufactured yet by a hole in the wall company that has one item in their catalog.
Just curious, has anyone called or emailed Wanstalls and demanded that they follow through on their promises that the people on the pre-order will get the rifles at the pre-sale price? They did state it more than once that people didn't need to worry and that they would honor the price.
It's been discussed already that Wanstalls screwed up by promising to deliver without a contract from their supplier but if you think about it anyone on the pre-order list had what could be considered a contract and Wanstalls broke the contract. They advertised on their site and the guys that jumped on the good deal deposited their money to seal the contract. They may have backtracked later and closed the pre-order and stated that it was a mistake but the guys that jumped in were told their deposit for the advertised price would be honored.
Even if they have to buy them through NS they would still get dealer pricing which would probably mean that at most they lose $100 per rifle. If retail is $2000 then dealer pricing can't be much higher than $1500.
Why should it be more? The only people that created drama was us being impatient, it was a few days of wondering what was going on for something that in the big picture means nothing and affects no one in a negative way. You didn't have one before and you still don't have one. What did you lose after all was said and done? Nothing, you get your $250 back and can move on in life. Adding the 10% off your next purchase if you roll the $250 to store credit was more than they had to do. These are the risks you take jumping into a pre-order for a rifle that hasn't even been manufactured yet by a hole in the wall company that has one item in their catalog.
Just curious, has anyone called or emailed Wanstalls and demanded that they follow through on their promises that the people on the pre-order will get the rifles at the pre-sale price? They did state it more than once that people didn't need to worry and that they would honor the price.
It's been discussed already that Wanstalls screwed up by promising to deliver without a contract from their supplier but if you think about it anyone on the pre-order list had what could be considered a contract and Wanstalls broke the contract. They advertised on their site and the guys that jumped on the good deal deposited their money to seal the contract. They may have backtracked later and closed the pre-order and stated that it was a mistake but the guys that jumped in were told their deposit for the advertised price would be honored.
Even if they have to buy them through NS they would still get dealer pricing which would probably mean that at most they lose $100 per rifle. If retail is $2000 then dealer pricing can't be much higher than $1500.
I emailed and asked if Wanstalls would ever carry this rifle, because I would use the store credit and 10% off towards it. 10% brings it down to 1899.... not great but better.
so...... can we take them at their word for anything now?
I emailed and asked if Wanstalls would ever carry this rifle, because I would use the store credit and 10% off towards it. 10% brings it down to 1899.... not great but better.
so...... can we take them at their word for anything now?



























