What caliber would like to see the Ruger No.1 in next?

[double gun]

....

 

[7mag]

7-30 Waters would be cool

 

[hoytcanon]

7-30 Waters would be cool

A pair of No.1-RSI rifles in 7-30 & .348 would turn my crank... I do believe that is all I would carry into the deer/bear woods.

 

[DOUGLAS D]

A pair of No.1-RSI rifles in 7-30 & .348 would turn my crank... I do believe that is all I would carry into the deer/bear woods.

Don’t know if you could squeeze a 348 into an RSI
Maybe a whole new model RSI S with the heavier barrel of the S medium sporter
Would be pretty ��

 

[jjohnwm]

A pair of No.1-RSI rifles in 7-30 & .348 would turn my crank... I do believe that is all I would carry into the deer/bear woods.

Really?

Do you actually believe that? I don't...

 

[iron cat]

Don’t know if you could squeeze a 348 into an RSI
Maybe a whole new model RSI S with the heavier barrel of the S medium sporter
Would be pretty ��

Why not? same action as they use for the 45/70, just a shorter barrel.
I don't think the shank profile is that much different is it?
Cat

 

[DOUGLAS D]

Why not? same action as they use for the 45/70, just a shorter barrel.
I don't think the shank profile is that much different is it?
Cat

If you stayed with the RSI barrel profile it would get pretty thin at the muzzle would it not?
I’ll have to check mine to see how much wall would be left around a 34 bore

 

[Onies]

.300 Savage would be interesting I think.

 

[SuperCub]

Ruger should do a special edition every year much like the Remington 700 Classic but should include different configurations as well to suit the chambering.

 

[hoytcanon]

Really?

Do you actually believe that? I don't...

You have to lean pretty heavily on the phrase "deer/bear woods" and how that is defined to make the statement work.

 

[hoytcanon]

If you stayed with the RSI barrel profile it would get pretty thin at the muzzle would it not?
I’ll have to check mine to see how much wall would be left around a 34 bore

Ruger's issue was with the stock profile, not the barrel profile. The 25 piece run of M77 RSI MKII .358's, left a bad taste in their mouth... the barrel contour and subsequent larger stock profile would require a total retooling, and thus far they have been disinclined to do so... it is not that they "can't", it is that they don't want to.

 

[DOUGLAS D]

Ruger's issue was with the stock profile, not the barrel profile. The 25 piece run of M77 RSI MKII .358's, left a bad taste in their mouth... the barrel contour and subsequent larger stock profile would require a total retooling, and thus far they have been disinclined to do so... it is not that they "can't", it is that they don't want to.

That’s along the lines I was thinking when I suggested a RSI S with the medium weight barrel profile to fit bigger than 30 caliber rounds
No doubt it would take a pile of re-tooling for what ultimately would sell a small number of rifles.
I’d love to see it but not holding my breath

 

[209jones]

Set triggers.

 

[m1978]

375 flanged, heavy weight rifle.

 

[longrifle]

500 s&w...

 

[D-Man]

How about a 30-40 Krag?

 

[buckbrush]

416 Rigby was offered at one time in the tropical model.

 

[double gun]

Set triggers.

No room for two, but single sets are around - no need to hope for ruger to get on board.

How about a 30-40 Krag?

Was done maybe 4-6 years ago if I remember correctly

 

[buckbrush]

Brownells used to sell a single set trigger for #1's.

 

[dark_timber]

A No.1-A or RSI in .348 Winchester.

Done and done