what do you think is the most versatile cartridge ever made?

Most people who start hunting typically look for a rifle that can handle most situations with out the recoil and breaking the bank hense why the 270 Win, 308 win, 30-06, 7MM Rem Mag get recommended a whole lot more.
Average box of 30-06 runs for 25$ for run of the mill cup and cores like federal, winchester, remington. The 300 Win mag on the other end runs approx 35$ for the same grade of box. Rifles with the name magnum tied to it tend to have higher price tags aswell.
The reduced loads tend to be available in big box stores. Go to walmart, canadian tire, or small general stores in northern Canada and finding a reduced load, most likely not going to to find it.

And if the ammo is cheap enough that you've sent a pile of it downrange already, your next shot is far more likely to go where you wanted it to go quickly and without fuss. If it's expensive and you're still on your first box then you're not going to be happy for long when it matters.
 
Maybe you should stick to what you know about in bears in Ottawa.

This is not an East/West thing... we have plenty of azzhole bears in Ontario... and plenty of guides here who have lots of experience dealing with bears, grumpy or otherwise... the bears that is... well, sometimes the guides too.
 
I may have mentioned it already...but when reviewing posts saw no mention by others...the 7mm-08.

Great cartridge and has a lot of positive attributes, anything that has been said regarding the 7x57 can be applied to it aside from some issues slinging long heavy bullets. I doubt you could get a bison legal load for it, but have no doubt that a suitably tough bullet directed well would do nothing good for one's health. Ammo availability it falls to the .30-06, .308 and .270. It wouldn't be my mountain sheep/goat and big bears cartridge of choice, that is why I voted 7 magnum, but I wouldn't turn one down if it meant I could experience those hunts.
 
This is not an East/West thing... we have plenty of azzhole bears in Ontario... and plenty of guides here who have lots of experience dealing with bears, grumpy or otherwise... the bears that is... well, sometimes the guides too.


I have no doubt about that. Black bears can be sneaky baztards. I'm more commenting on papaclaudes limited knowledge base. He wants us to accept his what he says as gospel, but won't offer the same courtesy to others that have experiences that differ from his narrative.
 
I don't think you actually know what you are talking about, you certainly don't seem to have much knowledge about the topic. Certainly not enough to be calling me a liar.

I should point out that it's not just hunters that I know that have been beaten up by bears. The attacks were various- getting chomped while riding a mountain bike. Getting swatted while hiking, getting a full blown charge and mauling that resulted in serious injury and a couple of different attacks when sleeping in tents that also resulted in injury.

I have been stalked by bears, had to spray a few bears ( with results that varied from excellent to basically undeterred and it was lucky we made it back to the truck since both our cans of spray were exhausted.) A few years ago a grizzly kept advancing on me despite me yelling at him to let him know I was there. It wasn't until the wind changed and he got a full whiff of human that he decided to depart, and that was about when I was lining up on his head.

I'm like the other guys. Around bears all the time. Not scared of bears. Had lots of encounters and experience with bears, and every now and then you run into a bear that is an @$$hole. It's just one facet of the outdoors that people should be aware of. Most of my negative bear encounters are fairly unremarkable in that anyone that spends enough time creeping around in the bush have some experiences like this. Start talking to some Western hunting guides and they will all have plenty of stories.

Maybe you should stick to what you know about in bears in Ottawa.

Now, there must certainly be some media links to all those incidents. And no, there are no bears in Ottawa, but if you go back and re-read my posts, you will read that I spent 2/3 of my life in black bear country. I am 60, which, just to save you getting the calculator out, means I lived 40 years in black bear country. Now, some of us have to move for bothersome things such as providing for one's family. That's what I had to do 21 years ago when I moved to Ottawa. When I was a kid, my old man was the "bear control guy" in town. One summer, he shot 17 right in town (population 3000 at the time). I've had 2 bears on my back steps when I opened my door, had one tear apart a screen door, just to name a few incidents. I also did some guiding for bear hunters as a teen. So yeah, while maybe not a world-class expert such as yourself, I know a bit about them, and I can categorically state that I do not personally know a single person that was mauled, hurt or killed by a bear.
 
I can categorically state that I do not personally know a single person that was mauled, hurt or killed by a bear.


You keep saying that as if it actually is relevant to someone other than you. It isn't.

How many people do you know who have drowned, died in an airline plane crash or in an avalanche?
 
Last edited:
This rifle holds 4 plus one belted magnums without drop boxes, dbm’s etc. 4 or 5 down gives me two for noise if I need them. :)

DmfJI4m.jpg


That’s a nice rifle regardless of cartridge.

I would rather have a good fitting, handling, carrying rifle in any cartridge. Rather then a pile of junk in what ever gets decided as the most versatile cartridge here.

More so even if I have to make a perfect shot quickly.
 
That’s quote worthy on the same page. Nice. Can’t argue with done that.

I plan on harvesting as many species with the 8x57 as I can. Thinking of caribou/moose/billy hunt in the near future. Rifle accompanied with me will most likely be a tikka t3x SS or my cz 550 with B&C stock, both chambered in 8mm.
 
Please explain the reference to mag box space and reduced loads with regards to a 300WM?
And lets face it...it's scrubbing 100 to 200 fps, which is definitely felt, but not magic at the reload bench, or at the ammo counter.
When it comes to versatility, it is, by definition the ability to do more than one thing?
A 7 1/2 pound rifle, with lower recoil, and say a 10 pound or heavier, rifle in the same chambering, would be, well, versatile? As opposed to having a golf bag full of rifles. Which while may be the norm on this forum, certainly isn't factual in real life.
There are a few big 7's available, without the belt. They tend to be a wee bit better than the ones with.

R.

A 308 or 3006 fires the same bullet, a 7x57 shoots the same bullet as a 7 rum.

In each instance its simply ____faster.

This thread reminds me of the one gun hunter threads. Someone already posted the Chuck Hawks chart. Only a few tick every box, some boxes dont matter, its a individual thing. Some reload 》》》ammo availability doesn't matter, some are not recoil sensitive》》》shoot a 375 hunting blacktail.

One caliber for NA? One hunter for NA? Every situation is individual.
 
I plan on harvesting as many species with the 8x57 as I can. Thinking of caribou/moose/billy hunt in the near future. Rifle accompanied with me will most likely be a tikka t3x SS or my cz 550 with B&C stock, both chambered in 8mm.

I think the 8X57 has proven itself the world over. Asking "What is the most versatile cartridge ever?" is kind of like asking what the best car, whiskey, or beer ever was - you'll get a different answer from almost everyone you ask, and they'll all be right.

My personal choice was the 308, but 2 others that would also fit the bill would be the 6.5 X 55 and 375 H&H. Problem is, the more I think about it, the more calibers I could include, but as someone else posted, I reload, and I'm not recoil sensitive so that opens the field up a wee bit.

BTW, I don't remember if the 22 LR made the cut, but it was used as a self defense round when it came out, has harvested just about every small game animal in the world. Tons of medium game were taken, and even today, thousands of large farm animals are sent to Valhalla with the venerable old .22.
 
I plan on harvesting as many species with the 8x57 as I can. Thinking of caribou/moose/billy hunt in the near future. Rifle accompanied with me will most likely be a tikka t3x SS or my cz 550 with B&C stock, both chambered in 8mm.

Went on a similar quest with .375 H&H, took a bit over a dozen species with it for which it was overkill for all but a couple. Your 8x57 is a more sensible choice and wish you luck. In the end it’s not what you shoot but what you actually do with it, that’s missing in much of this forum, you’re very much doing things.
 
Why is it so popular? Is it because it's cheap? That does make a lot sense, actually.
Being a reloader isn't a factor. There is reduced recoil ammo available.

R.

I think another reason is just history and inertia: military use helped availability and because guns last a long time, quite often grandpa's gun that you inherited was a 30-06.
 
My personal choice was the 308, but 2 others that would also fit the bill would be the 6.5 X 55 and 375 H&H. Problem is, the more I think about it, the more calibers I could include,.

You could include everything that fits "between" the 6.5 and the .375. And therein lies the folly of such topics.
 
Not really once you consider mountains, which is where the hardest game to take is. You need a very light rifle with a lot of reach, that’s not just everything. Plus the OP wants everything covered so that means bison with the same rifle, which has a limit here of 175grs and 2000ft-lbs or better at 100m. It gets a tad specific actually on what will do all that, a light .30-06, 8x57 as in one rifle’s case here, or 7 Mag will. Many won’t.
 
Being light on recoil and being reliable enough to take any north american game removes a lot of options. With recoil, everyone's threshold is different so we have to take an average for what most hunters can handle and I believe it would be a 30-06 or 7mm rem mag ball park. Question is, is the 30-06 and 7 rem mag capable of taking the largest game this country has to offer, I believe they are. Another thing to consider is the weight of the rifle, like Ardent has already stated, your a lot better off with a light weight rifle in the mountains, and I agree. Lightweight rifle's also compound recoil, another reason to go with a 30-06 or 7mm rem. So which one of these two chamberings is the winner. I think the 7mm rem mag has the trajectory advantage for mountain hunting, hard to beat 140 gr bullets doing 3200 fps or 120 gr at 3400 and on big game that 175 gr bullet will get the job done. I think the 7mm rem has the edge over the 30-06 but both are good choices. Seems I've changed my mind a little. :rolleyes:
 
Yeah I’d take 7mm rem mag over 3006 I think.... as a flat shooting jack of all trades rifle anyway. 30-06 is nice too tho. Think I’d rather go 300 win mag tho for a versatile cartridge and 308 for target shooting
 
Back
Top Bottom