I wish there was list of infractions of the BANNED.
I always wonder what one does to get banned?
In the back of my mind I'm always hoping each bad has zero to do with belief / ideology / opinions.
I pretend every name I see BANNED , was banned for attacking others with profanity, or threats, or any other unacceptable menacing behavior.
All of the above. People have no doubt been banned for attacking others, breaking the rules, illegals activities, spamming. Justified.
There are certainly some who were banned for very BS reasons, long time CGN members will know of some, a little pink avatar is the one that comes to mind. CGN is a business not a platform for free speech.
If you looked into Doug's ban it looks like he threatened someone over a EE deal gone wrong. Green tips straight up said that is why in the other thread. Sucks that a member who barely contributes a thing to this site, and hasn't logged on for a full year, ended up getting Doug banned. He undoubtedly broke the rules though, and rules are rules.
Hi liked the guy...He was very interesting! Seemed like a gentlemen also
Having been threatened by a few people here. There no need for it, ever !!! Both times I never deserved it, and if you got that much hate in you. You shouldn't really be owning firearms.
Having been threatened by a few people here. There no need for it, ever !!! Both times I never deserved it, and if you got that much hate in you. You shouldn't really be owning firearms.
Opinions on these forums often conflict with fundamental beliefs, and this conflict can result in animosity, which can then escalate to personal attacks and threats. The key to ensuring forum posts remain civil, is to debate the issue and not the personality, sometimes this is easier said than done. EE interactions are a bit different in that interactions between seller and buyer are normally conducted in a private manner, such as PMs, emails, texts, or even phone calls. What is said between the parties is not constrained by the knowledge that the dialog is public. There is a big difference between the guy who treats others the way he would like to be treated, and the guy who goes into a negotiation convinced that the other party intends to cheat him, or the individual whose goal it is to come out on top of any deal, if even by a small margin. Either of the former types will run into difficulty with an individual who is knowledgeable, righteous, and uncompromising. In some ways Douglas was an easy mark, because his short fuse was so obvious. It is certainly possible that the actual intent of the disgruntled party was to manufacture a conflict that would result in a ban.




























