What has this soldier got?

skirsons

CGN frequent flyer
Rating - 99.4%
178   1   1
Location
Ontario
Some kind of Enfield carbine?

LatvianSoldier.jpg
 
I'm going to say a Lee-Metford as well....but are you certain this chap is a soldier? He looks like a constable....granted I'm not familiar with turn of the century British uniform.
 
Looks like one of the Lee-Enfield carbines made in the Baltic states in the 20s by cutting down British surplus CLLEs. I suspect if you researched the uniform it's be interwar Estonian, Latvian or Lithuanian.
 
The Metfords also had dust covers over the bolts....which I don't clearly see. The hood on the front sight makes me wonder too.
It looks to have a charger bridge so...maybe a SMLE Mk111 based carbine/rifle. The Mk111* had no mag cut off.
 
Last edited:
Nyles has nailed it. It is either an Estonian or Latvian cavalry carbine, HOWEVER they are not a cut down long rifle...they were purpose made carbine. A quantity of them were made in the UK around the early 20's for the Baltic states. The UK made good use of surplus parts in the 20's.
 
Nyles has nailed it. It is either an Estonian or Latvian cavalry carbine, HOWEVER they are not a cut down long rifle...they were purpose made carbine. A quantity of them were made in the UK around the early 20's for the Baltic states. The UK made good use of surplus parts in the 20's.

Sure its not a RIC? (Royal Irish Costabulary Carbine?)


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fd/Lee-Enfield_1857.jpg/799px-Lee-Enfield_1857.jpg
 
Sure am, I've had an RIC for years. RICs have a collar at the muzzle for the P88 bayonet and don't have front sight ears.
 
Well I know he is a Latvian Private, enlisted. His helmet, an Adrian-type, is a Russian M15 I believe. If it was in color, the background of his collar patches would indicate artillery, infantry. In B&W pictures one must rely on the shoulder epaullettes to identify regiment but they are not always visible.
 
Well I just noticed the picture is labeled "Latvian Soldier jpg".....And the spurs give away the cavalry status of the soldier.

I suppose I should succeed to 'Nyles' deduction about this carbines origins.

I do think that the receiver looks as though it is a SMLE MK III in origin however.
 
Well I know he is a Latvian Private, enlisted. His helmet, an Adrian-type, is a Russian M15 I believe. If it was in color, the background of his collar patches would indicate artillery, infantry. In B&W pictures one must rely on the shoulder epaullettes to identify regiment but they are not always visible.

Why is a artillery/infantry soldier wearing spurs?
 
Were these Latvian carbines in 303 British? Or were they chambered for some other cartridge

All Latvian weapons in the interwar period were .303; the main infantry rifle was the P-14 and the Latvians had Lewis Guns, Maxim Guns, and the Vickers-Berthier all in .303.
 
Latvia also had quite a number of Mark III Ross Rifles, which they termed the "Ross-Enfield".

They also had Vickers Guns, Lewis Guns and Sopwith Camels to put under them.

VERY classy military!
.
 
Back
Top Bottom