what would be the approx value of this win 94

[freddyfour]

1964, 65, 66, 67 were pretty bad years for the 94. I forget how many years they produced the stamped lifter before they gave it up...

Was the lifter the only big issue?

 

[Wally1966]

From the current prices in the EE, $800.

LOL @ Freddy... I'd offer $100. lol

But seriously, it should sell for $300-350

 

[mike Crawford]

I had one that was a 1965 model .. Put it up for 250 and it sold in three minutes ,,,

 

[heronfish]

The question is not, what do you think it's worth to you, but what would it sell for.

At 400 shipped, that gun doesn't last long on the EE.
At 350 shipped it's gone in minutes I'd suspect.

 

[BigUglyMan]

You now what they say about a fool and his money...

 

[jimmyjazz]

I agree, it's not worth a penny to me... I wouldn't want that thing taking up space better utilized by a nice gun...

But some schmoe looking for a beater quad gun might pay $250.

I agree 100% good beater gun for someone .... but not me.

 

[MiG25]

It's a $300 gun, I'd say their as nice as a T3 or A-bolt. The pre-64's are fantastic rifles, nicer than current production Ruger 77's and #1's.

 

[guntech]

Was the lifter the only big issue?

Basically it was the lifter but as with all post 64 94's you can't reblue the action as you could the pre 64's.

 

[Bartledan]

It's a $300 gun, I'd say their as nice as a T3 or A-bolt. The pre-64's are fantastic rifles, nicer than current production Ruger 77's and #1's.

Those are some bold statements. Listen, my source got sent to the hoosegow. Where can I get some of what you're smoking? Hook a brother up?

 

[MiG25]

Those are some bold statements. Listen, my source got sent to the hoosegow. Where can I get some of what you're smoking? Hook a brother up?

Compare them side by side sometime.

 

[heronfish]

Compare them side by side sometime.

Compare a new ruger to a 70s era winchester 94?

The ruger comes out on top every time.

 

[trebor2880]

The question is not, what do you think it's worth to you, but what would it sell for.

At 400 shipped, that gun doesn't last long on the EE.
At 350 shipped it's gone in minutes I'd suspect.

I don't think anyone can argue with that.

 

[MiG25]

Compare a new ruger to a 70s era winchester 94?

The ruger comes out on top every time.

I said pre 64.

 

[suits me]

As a lefty I can say all 94's stink.

 

[okcorral1881]

As a lefty I can say all 94's stink.

I am a lefty too and a 94 suits me...............................

 

[tribal]

its going to sell between $300-$400. the closer to $300 the sooner it will sell.

 

[hoytcanon]

It's a $300 gun, I'd say their as nice as a T3 or A-bolt. The pre-64's are fantastic rifles, nicer than current production Ruger 77's and #1's.

This statement is ridiculous... "apples to oranges" to begin with.

 

[MiG25]

This statement is ridiculous... "apples to oranges" to begin with.

How so? I have a 1950's 94 in 32 Special and a Ruger #1 in 303, the 94 is better made, of seemingly better material and is more accurate. And 3 could be had for the price of 1.

I really like the #1 and the 94, the 77 is nice, and I'd never spend my own money on a T3 or A-Bolt.

 

[suits me]

I am a lefty too and a 94 suits me...............................

Never liked spent casings hitting me in the head.

 

[gunrunner100]

Other than the occasional stamped lifter failing, I have had issues with the cartridge link chipping due to poor quality metal, broken hammers and the common receiver blue.