I've been buying and shooting 700s for 5 decades and I intend to continue doing so. There are issues I've had with them, from stocks splitting to extractor failures, but a negligent discharge is always negligent and always the responsibility of the guy holding the rifle. Lethal tools cannot be made totally safe and remain useful, thus the onus is on each of us to ensure our rifles are in mechanically sound condition. Further the onus is on each of us to ensure that we can handle our rifles in a competent manner.
I have a 700 that would fire when the safety was flicked from safe to fire. I always keep the muzzle in a safe direction, so both resulted in no harm. However I would still not classify them as safe, nor were they the result of poor maintiance or a stupid user. It did this right out of the box, with no ttigger adjustment. It would only do it after beong bounced around on my shoulder for a few hours out in the field. Scared the #### out of me the first time. I went online and found out that it can happen if the trigger is adjusted to far out. So I made it as heavy as it would go (x-mark pro adjustable) and gave the tang a few good whacks with a rubber mallet while on safe, did not fire when pushed to fire thought it was good to go. Went after wolves a few months later and after walking in a few hours I flicked the safety to fire and sure enough, bang!
Rifle had trigger replaced under warranty by Remington.
Too many people think that Remington trigger issues are caused by incompetent people screwing with a trigger. This one did it out of the box. Moral of the story, keep the muzzle in a safe direction at all times.
That was a design flaw and all rifles which exibited this flaw were repaired free of charge. I made reference to this above, and yes this was never a flaw of the shooter. I've never bothered to research how many rifles were affected, but I know Rem redesigned the trigger groups after this. This is a sear engagement issue actually, and whoever was adjusting the triggers at the factory and sealing them was just a hair on the fine side........I've set Rem triggers many times to this level and then added a little engagement. It is a situation that can be repeated at will with almost all Rem triggers. Hence the initial thinking that the triggers had been played with. Although there was NOTHING wrong with these triggers except for being adjusted wrong at the factory, Rem decided they had to put in a new trigger group to appease public perception. Which by the way is virtually identical to the original, with a couple minor changes, just enough so it doesn't work with the inletting of the older stocks!!!
It is all the buyers' fault. There are good CRF rifles out there like the one I bought (Zastava M70 FS) from Elwood Epps at good price of a little over $700. So you can not buy remington then "smear" remington.
The easier way is to ignore, forget and dump remington.
I won't compliant about the QC of remington, because I will never own one, touch one.

I've owned Remington bolt actions for as long as I was old enough to own guns starting with a Remington Mod. 30 which I still have, 721s in 300 H&H, 308 Norma, countless 700s old and new, as well as a nice 40X and I have yet to have an issue with any or I'd be the first to complain.
For that matter, my Remingtons have been far more reliable than the other brands of rifles in my safes.
When it comes to putting meat in the freezer I can rely on them to do the job...
Good post.
It seems weird to me that people with demonstrated long term experience with Rem. rifles have not had problems. But all kinds of other folks have.
...
I'm not sure I should believe all the people who claim they have had cancer. It's never happened to me.

People say that the older Rem 700 rifles were better quality and I was wondering what year that drop in quality started?

People say that the older Rem 700 rifles were better quality and I was wondering what year that drop in quality started?




























