What's cool lately in the land of Semiauto Tactical Shotguns

knock-knock said:
Whats more likely to shoot a bigger variety of rounds/loads, piston or inertia?
Click to expand...

IMO or actual experience, Ive kinda cheated with a new shotgun.

Out of the box, with any type of semi -auto, I will lightly oil the action and then hook up a movie that is not dialogue sensitive. IE: Army of Darkness etc..

With 6 - 12g snap caps - the ones that are weighted like actual shells are best, I then get used to the loading procedure. Sighting up to target etc. I will also practice loadout procedures. Once my fingers start to get raw from doing this, I simply pull back on the charging handle like Im frapping with the firearm( hey my wife noticed this action)

It breaks in the action sooner since the action has been broken in even be4 live fire.

So with all my semis they really didnt need breaking in with heavy loads. With the Benelli M4 it took just half a box of no. 7 and then it worked like its suppose too. My latest semi a Mossberg 930 also took the no.7s and fired them right from the 1st box. I can say the same for my Hatsan MP-A.

All three shotguns have each 2 different types of gas and a piston system and now they can all fire 1 oz.slug, double 0 and everything else cause they can fire consistently the lighter target loads.
 
knock-knock said:
Sell me the Hatsan ;)
Click to expand...

I dont think u would really want it.

Its not a safe queen. It has been around the block several times.

Mind you its well tuned and is very easy to operate fast. Please note how shiny the chamber is - not a stock feature, Ive also beveled the chamber underneath.

Its got loading marks from my left hand (under slide slap misses) and its got an adjustable Frankenstein mod from ATI. (lol)

_7077513.jpg

Lemme see what I can hook u up with a new MP-A...
 
All ready got 3 or 4 scratchs on both my M4, it give them caracter and frankly my dear, i dont give a dam... JP.
 
A pretty gun to me is a gun that is of certain design that feels good to work with and suited for the job it was intended. I can admire it from a standpoint that it is practical to work with. I think people confuse the issue of having a nice looking gun with something that's scratch free or with out mud all over it. So when guys don't say they like their guns pretty, pretty is relative. Now when your guns aren't taken care of to that point they may fail eventually, that's not pretty either. It's like not brushing your teeth. They are a tool as well. They look pretty(or handsome if you prefer) because you brush them and take care of them. Same goes with the "pretty" guns. Fitting the job for what it is would be one of the most important things for a nice looking gun. If I look at a 10.5" AR and it's got a big long range scope on it and a bipod, I don't find that practical which means not a pretty gun. Does that make sense?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom