what's the most useless gun ever

stubblejumper said:
And when you add in the brass from the 22 rimfires that people can't be bothered to pick up,it makes for a real eyesore.
Click to expand...

i wear my tactical camo pants so i have big tactiacly pockets to clean up my empty brass from my 22 semi and 9mm also if your close enough to get hit by my brass then you are too close and are in full deservance of me at random firing a 525 grain bear tooth 45/70 out of my obnoxoius marlin guide gun and giving you a migraine from concussion!
 
If there is anything worse than "The Deagle" or Desert Eagle .50 I can't think of it.
In comparison the SKS is a triumph of practicality. They are expensive ,useless ,appeal to the worst gangster wannabbees ,are hideously ugly ,unconcealable ,expensive and tacky.
I have nothing against big handgun cartridges ,in revolvers that are actually designed for something besides posing and bragging.
 
leverlover said:
the reason for the creation of the m1 was that it took 1/4 of the time to train than pistols.
it was intended to be distributed among support troops.(engineers truck drivers medics ect) it was lighter than a garand had more ammo capacity and did not have that bloody "ping" that told the whole world your out!

they also made ones with folding stocks for paratroopers and spec forces.

......to those who dare nock the norc 1911 45 and m14.... i geuss you like paying out the @$$ for things. i owned a norc 1911 they are great guns! no there not as smooth as a sti 1911 off the shelf but. sti=1-2g norc...350.
with all that moola you save you can make your norc into a peice of art like no other and still come out paying less.:p

to all you naysayers of norc. i say... your jelous cuz i got a better deal:D:nest::owned::cheers:
Click to expand...

Why not just issue them the greasw gun? I think that it was the M2. It was in 45 acp and therefore did not creat a whole new case and cartridge supply problem!

I agree with you on the norc btw! Although I traded with gunner for the STI Spartan I have now!
 
people are butchering teh 303 brit... even a 303 which has been dried of ammo and allowed to rust still functions well as a jack handle or a mighty fine club! clearly not useless... my sks is also a spear, so that rules out that whole useless sks rant.

I'm going to vote for the boyz 13.9 99 mm anti tank rifle
 
Last edited:
I have to agree that the SKS is not useless.
It's perfect for bloodily suppressing human rights abuse demonstrators in 3rd world countries at close range.
It's also brilliant for shooting at the sky in you hooliganistic triumphant mood should you live on the Gaza Strip and work for Hezbollah.
That said it isn't wonderful mid to long range hunting rifle but then it wasn't meant to be.
The Boys Antitank rifle has to come close in terms of useless.
Too much recoil, antiquated when it was released as tanks were by then tougher than it could shoot, heavy therefore making the shooter a target from the tank he failed to blow up.
All of those silly big bore cals are similar though, like 577 T Rex.
Who can actually shoot one well enough to want it to be your main rifle in front of a bull elephant?
They are useful if you want to take vids of Saudis making fools of themselves though.
Hard call, that one...??!!
 
kombi1976 said:
I have to agree that the SKS is not useless.
It's perfect for bloodily suppressing human rights abuse demonstrators in 3rd world countries at close range.
It's also brilliant for shooting at the sky in you hooliganistic triumphant mood should you live on the Gaza Strip and work for Hezbollah.
Click to expand...


Your mixing up the SKS with the AK, besides which both the Mauser and the Enfield have been used to suppressing human rights as well. :rolleyes:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom