Here ya go....
![]()
LOL
That might work for standard rediculous comments, but that one was a doooooooooozy.
Here ya go....
![]()
It appears to me to be the exact opposite of what Shep posted.
With a couple of exceptions where it would not make sense to go too crazy with the price (Chinese imports, ie, Norc M14, etc.), all the Non-restricteds seem to be really high priced, compared with Restricteds of similar quality/reliability (predominantly ARs).
Of course, there are a couple of high priced Restricteds as well, but these are cool guns that will sell regardless of price.
So to me, it appears that we are paying more for certain rifles because they are NR. Imagine how well, XCRs and Sigs would sell at current prices if ARs were NR? Looking at the US market would give you a reasonable idea, I think.
I don't see the gun orgs (CSSA, etc.) pushing this much, but they are supported by dealers who stand to lose if ARs are made NR.
Again, just my two cents, so take it or leave it.
Regards.
Mark
$2,000 in the gun world is still cheap...
Using AR as a basis is just bit naive, when you can purchase 80% AR forgings at almost the same price as hunk of raw aluminum and most of your AR sub components can be purchased from other ready supplies.
There really isn't much in-house machining or manufacturing left in building an AR.
The same thing happens here. Small amounts of something means big prices, so why bother to bring in more Colts, DD etc. when you can sell a few "rare" items for big sums, and fight any move to bring in more at the risk of devaluing what is already on the market here.
No it's not.
As an aside, a raw AR forging costs in the region of $12 (someone looked into this the other day on another thread). Compare that to what 80% machined forgings sell for. Like $80 in the U.S. You should also note that CNC equipment is expensive, and the fixtures required to produce lowers in any quantity are expensive to buy or time consuming to produce. The lower cost of completed lowers has to do with economy of scale and contracting with larger firms (like Aero Precision) to produce very large quantities of a specific item. So someone is making a lot of money for a bit of time on a CNC machine.
What people are saying, is that retailers would be sitting with shelves full of XCRs, etc. if they tried to charge the same prices they do today if ARs were NR. The only reason XCRs, etc. are so popular here is because they are NR.
De-restricting the AR in Canada will be fought by certain segments of the gun community, mostly for financial reasons. The same thing would happen in the US if the decision to allow production and sale of FA firearms was brought up.
Regards.
Mark
Prices are high cuz retards keep buying them.
There is nothing fair about "supply and demand". All that is, is a nicer way of saying "charge as much as we can get away with".
If you look at a different "market", the people who most want drugs to stay illegal are the people selling them. Imagine what would happen if drugs were legalized? Who would lose money?
The same thing happens here. Small amounts of something means big prices, so why bother to bring in more Colts, DD etc. when you can sell a few "rare" items for big sums, and fight any move to bring in more at the risk of devaluing what is already on the market here.
I have already seen this argument debated in the US regarding FA.
Call me a conspiracy theorist, etc. but I don't see anyone coming up with proof for any other explanation.
Regards.
Mark
Import/Export is a lot of work, especially for goods like firearms. You'd be crazy to think that someone wouldn't charge for their time/hassle in doing so.




























