This rifle is going to really push some people over the edge....
![]()
This rifle is going to really push some people over the edge....
![]()
I guess them that grew up with 10-22's and sks's with the spray'n prey mentality need them back ups.
One could imagine furr fever in there somewhere.
What kind of dainty little hands do people have that they can't wrap them around the front of a slightly protruding magazine and carry a rifle?
You were sent back in time to get boomers to embrace AI magazines to prevent the machines from taking over?
I'm thinking of the newer-manufacture big-game hunting rifles. Some of them now come with large-capacity detachable magazines capable of holding 10 rounds. Who needs 10 rounds in the magazine when hunting? I can't think of a single time when I've been hunting over the past 50+ years that I've ever felt the need for more than the 3 or 4 rounds in my magazines. I greatly prefer fixed magazines with hinged floorplates over detachable magazines (both aesthetically and for security), but I can live with a 3-5 round detachable mag if it sits flush with the bottom of the stock. The larger magazines that drop way down below the stock line look terrible, in my opinion, but more importantly add unnecessary weight (close to 4-5 oz.or more when fully loaded) as well as making the rifle more difficult to carry in the field. When I'm carrying a rifle in the field (not slung) I usually carry it with my hand under about the location of the magazine. That seems to be about the best point for balance. A magazine hanging down in that location gets in the way. Is this trend just a nod to tacticool?
I guess them that grew up with 10-22's and sks's with the spray'n prey mentality need them back ups.
One could imagine furr fever in there somewhere.
Hey, I think you are getting a lot of responses that come across as defensive because of the language in your post. For example, using the phrase "What's with the ...." comes across as very negative and judgemental towards whatever is to follow. Additionally, "Who needs 10 rounds in the magazine when hunting?" really sounds more like a statement than a question you actually want an answer to. Finally, calling it "tacticool" seems judgemental and appears very closed-minded. I suggest something like, "For those using 10 round magazines, what advantages have you found using them in hunting rifles?" That phrasing implies that the person asking the question is open to the possibility that 10 round magazines make sense in some situations and should solicit less defensive responses.
You are right, this thread reminds me of the spring easing post which also resulted in negativity, but really, I think he meant what he said
Do you guys live in a Carpathian forest in a Victorian era adventure novel or something? Who is getting stalked by packs of dangerous wolves?
Naw, we’re just accustomed to the modern world. Do you have an extra box of ammo with you when you go out hunting, in case you have to confirm zero or sight in for some reason or get lost and need to fire a couple signal shot? I know I have had to resight on a trip away from home, my extra 10rd mag for my no.4 sure came in handy on that 3 day trip.
I’ll tell you what I don’t bring an extra mag of ammo for, spray and pray that what.
Different hunts require different teckneeks.
Out of town, two rifles and lotsa ammo.
Day hunts, different story.
And ahhhh Bubbah Gump to you.