GunsNotPuns
CGN frequent flyer
how or why anyone would possibly take umbrage, in a thread about tuners, is not hard to understand.
If someone is taking umbrage about barrel tuners in any context, they need to touch grass.
how or why anyone would possibly take umbrage, in a thread about tuners, is not hard to understand.
If you look through the "100 yard challenge" thread, you will see I posted two results of two of my rifles there. Those are the results that I can repeat. They are not super good (about 1.1 to 1.2 inch groups in average at 100 meters). But more importantly I can do this with same rifle and ammo combination every day when weather permits.
To me consistency and repeatability are the key. You can have a tuner shooting 1/4 inch group out to 100 yard and claim a victory, can you repeat this? I doubt. But I can for a 1-ish MOA with my rifles/ammo combination, over and over again.
In the pictures, none of them had tuner on them because they don't make any noticeable difference as far as I can tell. At least the outcome is not consistent.
One tuner on one rifle with one ammo can shot 3/4 MOA out of 100 yard but produces 1.5 inch very next day with similar weather condition. By the way before anyone wants to educate me how to use tuner, I have 2, used to have 3. I still have KSS ATS and EC. They are not cheap stuff, but again they don't produce noticeable and consistent result.
There are tons of youtube videos out there that people joke around the tuner, such as 2 cents tuner which is an elastic band, or $1 tuner which is nothing more than a stainless steel washer/nut from homedepot.
I think calling out something someone owns a myth really hurt their feelings. They feel the asset they value is bad-mouthed.
I certainly feel let down myself when the $300 KSS tuner doesn't deliver. But I admit it's a trash or a myth.....
When an opinion differs from someone else's, of course it doesn't mean it is stupid. But it can be. When this happens and it's pointed out some may take offence and mistake it for hubris. When the difference is indistiguishable the result is frustration for anyone who knows better. But that's a digression and perhaps it's more helpful to stick to the topic of tuners.
This thread has some good information but also a lot of bad or vague or incomplete or misleading content.
Tuners are definitely not, as someone has suggested, a "myth," something that doesn't work. They may well not work for someone, and there are reasons to explain that, but it doesn't follow that they don't and can't work. Among serious and knowledgeable rimfire shooters there is unanimity on this question.
Someone also suggested that money would be better spent on good ammo. There's a lot of truth in that. A tuner can't turn poor ammo into something else, it can't make inconsistent ammo consistent. In fact, it can't do anything useful with ammo that isn't already shooting very well.
On top of that, if a rifle barrel is a mass produced factory barrel, it won't benefit significantly from a barrel tuner. Why? Bores of modest quality invariably are not capable of producing consistently good results. This is the reason why the most consistently good results aren't typically produced by mass produced factory rifles. And it must be remembered that not all good barrels will respond equally or even well with a tuner. For example, heavy short barrels don't respond well to tuners. There's good evidence also that neither do very long and heavy ones. Tuners seem to be most effective on good barrels from about 24 - 26" with a thickness of up to .9".
Too many shooters look for a cost-saving way of improving accuracy, but fail to understand that a tuner isn't it. A good rifle/barrel with good ammo will outperform a middling rifle with middling ammo and a tuner every time. There are no shortcuts in rimfire performance.
When shooters are not getting the accuracy performance they wish to achieve, they must first look to getting a good rifle with a good barrel. Then they must look to getting good ammo. Only when a shooter has a good rifle/barrel and ammo that shoots very well should he consider getting a tuner. And once he has one, it usually involves a good amount of testing for the best tuner adjusment. Anything else is just spinning the tires.
Where is the majical 24-26" barrel thing coming from? The Anschutz catalogue or RFC. The .9" is interesting also. Now would that be any specific profile and would the barrel material or fluting be influential on the tuners performance. What about the weight of the tuner or the length.
+1 Tuna Can. Insite Arms would be my next choice. EC Tuner 3rd place.
If your 10'000 dollar rig is drilling tiny holes, there is not much sense in screwing around..... but to then conclude that somebody else having success with a tuner is a myth is a bit presumptuous.
Well, we have yet to define what are tiny groups and what's the cost of a "brand new car"
- Chevrolet Spark can be had new for under $12k...
Sorry, couldn't resist![]()
If tuners are a myth why does pretty much every top benchrest shooter have one on there rifle?