Whats your Chronograph???

Anyone using the Steinert Superchrono?

I had one for a while, I liked that it could be used in any light conditions, or rain, and it seemed to be accurate. It gave velocities that I expected but I didnt compare it to any other type of chrono to confirm. They are a nicely made unit and simple to use. It has a large detection area and it never missed a shot. Everything I've read on the technology is that it is proven and accurate, but the downside of the design seems to be how short the space is between the sensors. Very easy to have it out of alignment with the bullet path and affect the numbers, just like any chronograph with closely spaced sensors. The other thing I didnt like is the display was a bit tough to seefrom the bench, I didnt have a remote readout and the display screen is on top so I would have to stand up if I wanted to see the velocity after each shot. I bought it to replace my old shooting chrony beta because it was so fussy to light conditions. Used it for a while then after reading lots of good reviews about ProChrono, I sold it and bought the ProChrono Pal.
 
LabRadar.

If you are investing the time and money to reload the best ammo you can, why not invest in the piece of equipment that gives you the most accurate data about that ammo? Ease of use is a big pro as well.

Just my two cents...
 
LabRadar.

If you are investing the time and money to reload the best ammo you can, why not invest in the piece of equipment that gives you the most accurate data about that ammo? Ease of use is a big pro as well.

Just my two cents...

Why do you believe that the LabRadar unit gives you the "most accurate" data? How does it compare to the Oehler 35P? Is it much more accurate than the affordable ProChrono? How does the LabRadar do around 4000 fps?
 
Last edited:
Why do you believe that the LabRadar unit gives you the "most accurate" data? How does it compare to the Oehler 35P? Is it much more accurate than the affordable ProChrono? How does the LabRadar do around 4000 fps?

My statement was based on the research I did prior to purchasing a Labradar, which showed me that the LabRadar had a slight edge over the Oehler offerings in that it provides a "true" MV, given that the unit is directly in line with the muzzle of the firearm vice ten feet on front. Some would say that is not a relevant point, however to me it is. As well, the LabRadar had a slight edge in consistency.

As well, I'm pretty sure that the Oehler will not give velocities at various distances whereas the LabRadar will. Again, maybe not important to some, but important to me. This alone gives me a better idea of what the reloaded ammunition is doing across the full spectrum of the bullet's flight (or near the full spectrum anyway). Couple that with instant ES, and SD viewing for each individual string at the push of a button, and I would say that gives me the "most accurate" data I can attain at a reasonable price point.

How does the LabRadar do around 4000fps? Well as it's stated velocity range only goes to 3900fps, I'm not too sure. However I don't fire anything that achieves 4000fps, so it is a non-issue for me.

Cheers.
 
I eye ball it. Seems like a solid 3500 fps from my 308 Win pushing 180gr Accubond.... lol

I had a chromo but found it annoying. Either I had a flaky one or the sun played games with it.

I was debating of buying a new one.
 
I have a bunch of Chonys. I make a point of testing on cloudy days. 100% reliable under clouds. I usually use the basic one, but the model that will remember 10 shots and give you a HI, Lo, Av and SD is handy.

I have not see one tested and compared to any other machine except Ohler. It was more accurate than the Ohler. I think this was due to a higher clock speed. That was 15 years ago. No idea of what clock speed current models use.
 
I have a bunch of Chonys. I make a point of testing on cloudy days. 100% reliable under clouds. I usually use the basic one, but the model that will remember 10 shots and give you a HI, Lo, Av and SD is handy.

I have not see one tested and compared to any other machine except Ohler. It was more accurate than the Ohler. I think this was due to a higher clock speed. That was 15 years ago. No idea of what clock speed current models use.

That was good information there, young fellow.
Bruce
 
My statement was based on the research I did prior to purchasing a Labradar, which showed me that the LabRadar had a slight edge over the Oehler offerings in that it provides a "true" MV, given that the unit is directly in line with the muzzle of the firearm vice ten feet on front. Some would say that is not a relevant point, however to me it is. As well, the LabRadar had a slight edge in consistency.

As well, I'm pretty sure that the Oehler will not give velocities at various distances whereas the LabRadar will. Again, maybe not important to some, but important to me. This alone gives me a better idea of what the reloaded ammunition is doing across the full spectrum of the bullet's flight (or near the full spectrum anyway). Couple that with instant ES, and SD viewing for each individual string at the push of a button, and I would say that gives me the "most accurate" data I can attain at a reasonable price point.

How does the LabRadar do around 4000fps? Well as it's stated velocity range only goes to 3900fps, I'm not too sure. However I don't fire anything that achieves 4000fps, so it is a non-issue for me.

Cheers.

I don't disagree with anything you've stated but your comment was this:

LabRadar.


If you are investing the time and money to reload the best ammo you can, why not invest in the piece of equipment that gives you the most accurate data about that ammo? Ease of use is a big pro as well.


Just my two cents...

Well you sort of provided the answer by explain why the LabRadar unit works for YOU.

I only need to make sure that my handgun reloads meet a minimum power factor and that the SD and ES are acceptable. Will the LabRadar unit do that? Sure, but for ME the simple, affordable, and accurate ProChrono unit gets the job done.

I guess what I'm getting at is that it shouldn't be LabRadar or bust, lol.

Cheers.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom