Enfields
QUOTE
youd think the armyd get bored of them and just pass them off...
The Canadian Army did just that, OVER 50 YEARS AGO, and the British well before that. The only ones the Army has are in Museums, and maybe for Ceremonial use.
After WWII, many of the Millions of Enfields made were declared Surplus, and were released by the British to raise cash to help pay for the cost of the War.
Back in the late 1950s you could walk into an Eatons store, and chose from a whole rack of them for $9.95, or a "sporterized" one for $14.95, for the Number 1 Mark III rifles. A Number 4 rifle was about $5 more, and a complete Number 4 Mark 1 T Sniper rifle complete with scope, chest, and scope tin was $49.95, (which is probably about $500 todays currency.)
And it wasn't only the Lee Enfields or SMLE rifles. Mausers, Carcanos, Boyes 55 Calibre anti-tank rifles, Cooey .22 trainers, Springfields, Garands, M1 Carbines, Lugers, Colt 1911s, and lots of dewat (and active machine guns because you could own them at the time) were available.
The first Lewis Gun I bought was $65, complete with carrying chest, 4 drum magazines, magazine loader, spare barrel and lots of spare parts, and it even had anti-aircraft sights. A MP-40 with 1000 rounds of ammo and 3 mags was $75, and a brand new Savage 1928 Thompson with some 20 and 30 round magazines and a 50 round drum was an astronomical $135. Stens all over the place, and a few Brens too. And, we shot them without a lot of hassle.
But, 50+ years have passed, more people are collecting military rifles, more people are interested in History, the Internet is here, the Liberals have neutered the gun owners of Canada, and the supply of these goodies has diminished to the point of where we are considering the beaters that we would not have even glanced at 20 years ago as being "very good for their age." With prices to match.
.