Who here owns a Non Restricted Sten gun from Sask Sten?.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tyockell18 said:
Just curious about these, prices, waiting times, any possible current legal issues.

If they are still good to go for owning here, do you like yours, does it have any mechanical issues ect.?.

Would you mind posting a pic or two of yours so I can see the options they have available in non restricted lengths?.
Click to expand...

in past i did make two purchases with ########, transaction was smooth, was happy with product, was pricely for a sten but for those without a 12.2 or 12.3 , what else are you gonna do. further, its legal with papers. As for the comments in this thread, i am mute on it, please lets leave it at that, so my personal experince, good product, fair prices, good service.
 
tj black said:
in past i did make two purchases with ########, transaction was smooth, was happy with product, was pricely for a sten but for those without a 12.2 or 12.3 , what else are you gonna do. further, its legal with papers. As for the comments in this thread, i am mute on it, please lets leave it at that, so my personal experince, good product, fair prices, good service.
Click to expand...
:needPics:
 
Got my STEN parts kit out of Canada. Reactivated it back when we could do that.
Fortunately the reciever was cut BEHIND the ejector so the arse end of the reciever is now a car exhaust pipe section. Full auto is fun, but I have to BUY the ammunition
 
######## guy was a Swift Current show last weekend. He had a whole table full of short and long barrel stens. If so many people feel these are illegal he must be very brave to show them. Or maybe they are legal and and a lot of people are just wrong. Some of you need to get a grip.
 
Who said they were illegal? The FRT lists a number of his guns, prohibited, restricted and non-restricted, depending.
 
Barrel length, etc.
Isn't there a clip of one being fired full auto on the builder's website? Wouldn't that one would be prohibited?
 
Those sneaky devils did a switch, and pulled a full auto from their reference collection, to justify prohibiting the gun they tested?
Yeah, that's what must have happenned. That's the ticket.
 
Maybe I'm imagining things but it sure looks like they use parts from two guns in that clip, but I guess I could be wrong.:)
 
Surely they must have detailed exactly what they did.
You know, full disclosure, openess, transparency, etc.
 
Surely ?

I only know that what can't speak can't lie. What do you know ?

PS, Come to think of it, not only was what they did illegal, but it was also against the rules of court.

The RCMP is not allowed to manufacture the evidence to suit the crime.
 
Last edited:
FWIW, the RCMP has always maintained that if a simple bolt swap can make a gun go full-auto, then it is not acceptable. Conversion to full-auto has to require tools and modifications to the firearm, else it meets the "easily converted" criteria for prohibition.

To refresh people's memory, the reason ######## was in trouble in the first place is he used the SAS-3 Sten MkIIS FRT number to register open-bolt guns with extended sear catches. This proved unacceptable by the RCMP lab and prompted a bunch of legal woes for ######## and all the other more law abiding SAS-3 owners who then had their guns placed in FRT limbo. It's also what got him banned from this site if I recall.

I trust his present products are no longer such "shades of grey".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom