Why can I find so few details about the Adler Arms/Eagle RS-Q1/RSQ1, Non restricted?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Really? I know 4 people in the Fraser valley BC who bought an RSQ1 and and are very very happy with their rifles. Only complaint being weight. One super rich East Indian dude who owns more guns than anyone I know said it was his new favourite rifle. I can shoot half inch groups at 100 yards with crappy factory ammo (with the occasional fliers because of ammo inconsistency)
 
Siwash Sports in Chilliwack carried the RSQ1s for a while, I spoke with them. KKS tactical out of Prince George sold like 9 or 10 of them. They’re not fake or a scam I spoke with the owner myself
 
Really? I know 4 people in the Fraser valley BC who bought an RSQ1 and and are very very happy with their rifles. Only complaint being weight. One super rich East Indian dude who owns more guns than anyone I know said it was his new favourite rifle. I can shoot half inch groups at 100 yards with crappy factory ammo (with the occasional fliers because of ammo inconsistency)

Lol so your gun shoots 1/2 MOA with cheap ammo, except for when it doesn't because you get flyers with cheap ammo? Groundbreaking.

tenor.gif
 
Yes Einstein, there’s several variables. The shooter, optic, rifle and ammunition. Winchester 55 grain white box ammo does 1/2 - 3/4 MOA if I’m doing my part. With other more consistent ammo it’s 1/3 -1/2 MOA with no fliers. What I’m saying is it shoots very well with a lot of different ammo types even less consistent bulk factory ammo.
 
Carry a copy of the frt if you purchase it.

The FRT means SFA when it can be reinterpreted at the whim of whoever is running the lab. Lots of examples of something that was non-restricted on the FRT suddenly being changed. Swiss Arms, Vz 58, X95 MSW, etc…
 
You obviously have some personal grievance with Stephen otherwise why would you have such vitriol in your fairy tales. You’ve never handled the rifle or compared it with others.. I have…Anyone with a brain… wouldn’t make up defamatory claims and assume someone’s identity online. I’m not Stephen Adler lmao and the ATRS is nowhere near as accurate or harmonically consistent as the RSQ1, I’ve tested both at 100 yards with the same ammunition. If you want to have more harmonic nodes of accuracy then you have to increase weight and thickness. There’s a reason there’s a weight limit on PRS and similar long range shooting competitions. ATRS is lighter and thinner for sure but definitely not as accurate.
 
Rifle is not prohib. It’s non restricted, rcmp have checked mine out, no problems. Proprietary upper and lower, proprietary bcg, charging handle, barrel extension. has nothing to do with the slr lol and it’s not using the slr frt. Where did you read it’s using the slr frt

It is Prohib, SLR lower and upper, HE TOLD ME HIMSELF, bolts and mates to each other with no issues, the only difference is he uses an extra cross locking bolt compared to the SLR to prevent it from potentially backing out. Maccabee defense had a lawsuit against him for ripping off their design (He was part of the team that designed the SLR) in his eyes, it was basically "I helped make this, so i will use the design anyways" multiple cease and desist letters for constantly violating previous court orders, hence the numerous name changes every time it came up on the market. I have dealt with him personally, I would not recommend buying them, even if the rifle is in hand and functioning. In a personal meeting he has openly told me stuff like "If anybody comes to hurt my family i will trust this rifle to mow them down" and " These are all ordered for production runs with buyers already, but if you can do upfront payment cash today i can let you leave with one, the person this is going to can wait for the next run, they dont know any better." This was Pre OIC when the rifles were 1899. Last i checked he wanted 4999 for them.
Among the shady tactics, multiple fake accounts bragging about it and leaving reviews for each other, multiple fake FB accounts spamming gun groups on Facebook, and past user experiences, it would be a hard pass.

"the RCMP checked mine out" has zero standing if an officer decides to pull you over and charge you with possession, FRT may not be law but is the only legal reference point for the crown to base their charges on, no FRT, no prior authorization by lab to classification status would open you up to any number of charges, being an SLR lower, it would be charged as a prohib, for being a variant of an SLR. (exact reason why he didn't apply for an FRT, it is an SLR)

Knowing everything i know, I wouldn't be surprised if the original bump reviving this years old post was in order to slyly market his product again.
 
You obviously have some personal grievance with Stephen otherwise why would you have such vitriol in your fairy tales. You’ve never handled the rifle or compared it with others.. I have…Anyone with a brain… wouldn’t make up defamatory claims and assume someone’s identity online. I’m not Stephen Adler lmao and the ATRS is nowhere near as accurate or harmonically consistent as the RSQ1, I’ve tested both at 100 yards with the same ammunition. If you want to have more harmonic nodes of accuracy then you have to increase weight and thickness. There’s a reason there’s a weight limit on PRS and similar long range shooting competitions. ATRS is lighter and thinner for sure but definitely not as accurate.

"I love mine so much im selling it" lol. I know 2 people that bought this piece of ####, one had keyholing issues at 25 yards out of the box and got ran around the block for MONTHS for just a barrel replacement then, demanded a refund after said months. the other just never got his after ordering from steven scamdler, and only got a refund when he threatened to involve the rcmp. either you are alder or you are misrepresenting the facts to make your ABOSLOUTE DOG of a rifle someone else's problem. cause nobody likes this cope slr wannabe, especially for 4250 lol. Id take my chances with a wk180 before the slr cope clone rsqueer 1. ATRS is king, and more accurate if you actually know how to build rifles, which clearly you dont ;)
 
Once again anyone with a brain would just buy a atrs over the rs-crap 1, but keep trying to generate attention for your ad on here and ####### Steven adler. Thought dealers had to register with cgn

Pretty high chance of this being one of their sham accounts promoting the rifle here xD
this post may rat himself out being a manufacturer/business license holder
this is a posting from him marketing it.

https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/2340635-RSQ1-Mag-Dump

No point arguing though, anybody with a sound mind and access to basic internet and research skills would skip on this in a heartbeat, exactly why these guys have resorted to such shady marketing over the years
 
Pretty high chance of this being one of their sham accounts promoting the rifle here xD
this post may rat himself out being a manufacturer/business license holder
this is a posting from him marketing it.

https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/showthread.php/2340635-RSQ1-Mag-Dump

No point arguing though, anybody with a sound mind and access to basic internet and research skills would skip on this in a heartbeat, exactly why these guys have resorted to such shady marketing over the years

HAHAHAHA I KNEW IT! Account on cgn and ####### based in bc right near where adler is. Maybe next time you'll shill with a new account adler you do not pass
 
Never ever been sued by macabee lmaooooo Defense Balistics LLC (USA) has had a patent on this design since 1968. The RSQ1s were NEVER EVER SOLD FOR $1899 lmaooooo where in the hell did you get this info? Or it’s another fairytale your imaginative mind has spun up.. you have no idea what you’re talking about. Atleast try to make up something more believable..
 
For reference for anybody else stumbling across this thread in the future.


https://www.canadiangunnutz.com/for...6876-RS-Q2-Non-Restricted-Semi-Auto-308-rifle

thread was only revived so STEVEN ADLER could try and offload some more keyholing dog#### rifles to unsuspecting gunowners. anyone viewing this thread from the future AVOID at ALL COSTS. youre better off with literally anything else including a home made slam fire pipe shotgun, accuracy is the same LOL
 
Never ever been sued by macabee lmaooooo Defense Balistics LLC (USA) has had a patent on this design since 1968. The RSQ1s were NEVER EVER SOLD FOR $1899 lmaooooo where in the hell did you get this info? Or it’s another fairytale your imaginative mind has spun up.. you have no idea what you’re talking about. Atleast try to make up something more believable..

So the patent expired in 1988...
 
Rifles don’t key hole, they’re sub MOA even at 500 yards. Why don’t you say Santa Claus himself showed you these rifles and you verified it with a Vatican KGB double agent on Mars. The more you post about this the more it shows that this is a personal issue you have with someone and not the rifle itself because you’ve clearly never handled or fired one. I could also sit here and type up retarded non sense and hope people who don’t know any better believe it.
 
Okay . . . . so this thread went crazy and apparently I am a shill. I have no association with the company that makes the RSQ1 other than I am owner of their products. I guess I am an Insite Arms shill too, because I have an Impact Precision 737R receiver and the barrelled action it is in came from Insite Arms. I don’t think because I give my opinion on Insite Arms that it makes me a shill for them, nor does it make me a shill for the RSQ1.
For everyone that thinks the rifles don’t exist, please send me a DM with an invite to your range and we can have a bit of a 223/5.56 gas gun match. Your ATRS MS or Bren 2 or Lockhart or BCL or whatever shooting any factory ammo you want against my RSQ1 shooting Federal Gold Medal Match 77 grain SMK.
We can shoot paper or steel, your choice, to any distance you want. Just tell me when and where and I’ll be there. Because anyone not willing to put their money where their mouth is, is just a keyboard warrior. Your gas gun against the RSQ1. Let’s these theories and statements to the test. And we can publish the results on here.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom