Why can I find so few details about the Adler Arms/Eagle RS-Q1/RSQ1, Non restricted?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree the prices are crazy for anything non-restricted or even “non-restricted adjacent” like the Modern Sporter. A quick scroll through the Equipment Exchange or ####### will demonstrate how ridiculous all the prices in Canada have gotten. $4500 for any of these rifles is too much, because a quick search of companies like Noveske or Radian or Geissele or PSA will show you that you can buy some amazing hardware for a lot less money.
 
Last edited:
It seems we have ourselves a competition. BigMasterShrek insists it be on crown land and we shoot over 1000 rounds. He says he only shoot over 1000 rounds when he goes out. So, he insists my rifle won’t make it past the first 100 rounds.
 
Last edited:
AntiqueArsenal said:
Never ever been sued by macabee lmaooooo Defense Balistics LLC (USA) has had a patent on this design since 1968. The RSQ1s were NEVER EVER SOLD FOR $1899 lmaooooo where in the hell did you get this info? Or it’s another fairytale your imaginative mind has spun up.. you have no idea what you’re talking about. Atleast try to make up something more believable..
Click to expand...

So Defense Ballistics (Best name ever) had a patent on a firearm design (obviously) based on the AR-15 in 1968, even though Colt's patents on the AR-15 didn't expire until the late 70s? You're not really giving off the impression of credibility here, lol.

Also, lmaooooooo you sound like an idiot 14 year old lamoooooo
 
Scotty454 said:
So Defense Ballistics (Best name ever) had a patent on a firearm design (obviously) based on the AR-15 in 1968, even though Colt's patents on the AR-15 didn't expire until the late 70s? You're not really giving off the impression of credibility here, lol.

Also, lmaooooooo you sound like an idiot 14 year old lamoooooo
Click to expand...

Patents are registered therefore this is all verifiable one way or another.:popCorn:
 
It’s not an AR15 bud, receivers interface in a completely different way. They x2 as thick as on a AR15 and they slide together on rails, lock on lugs and are secured by a bolt. The internal dimensions of the receivers are proprietary hence it is not an AR or variant under Canadian law regardless of the cosmetic similarities. The AR design which relies on a single pin is inherently not as harmonically consistent as the RSQ1. The fact the upper and lower on an AR15 rattle and vibrate against each other inconsistently is the reason why they sell rubber wedges designed to mitigate this problem. Before the bullet leaves the muzzle there are a lot of shockwaves/vibrations reverberating throughout the rifle causing the bullet to leave the muzzle at a different point in the “muzzle whip/wave” so even though the upper is what sends the bullet it is vibrating against the lower which results in less consistency/accuracy at long range and less harmonic nodes of accuracy with different types of ammo.
 
AntiqueArsenal said:
It’s not an AR15 bud, receivers interface in a completely different way. They x2 as thick as on a AR15 and they slide together on rails, lock on lugs and are secured by a bolt. The internal dimensions of the receivers are proprietary hence it is not an AR or variant under Canadian law regardless of the cosmetic similarities. The AR design which relies on a single pin is inherently not as harmonically consistent as the RSQ1. The fact the upper and lower on an AR15 rattle and vibrate against each other inconsistently is the reason why they sell rubber wedges designed to mitigate this problem. Before the bullet leaves the muzzle there are a lot of shockwaves/vibrations reverberating throughout the rifle causing the bullet to leave the muzzle at a different point in the “muzzle whip/wave” so even though the upper is what sends the bullet it is vibrating against the lower which results in less consistency/accuracy at long range and less harmonic nodes of accuracy with different types of ammo.
Click to expand...

:jerkit:

I'm aware of the receiver interface, it's the same as the SLR (Like just about everything else on the rifle). But thanks for the explanation nobody asked for, lol.

And while it isn't an AR-15, it's close enough that your 1968 patent surely would have infringed on Colt's. If it existed. Which it likely never did.


DieselDave said:
I haven't been able to find this patent but would love to see it. Has anyone found the patent number?
Click to expand...

Not likely, Defense Ballistics LLC barely exists. It's kind of funny.
 
SLR and macabee are bastardized clones of the RSQ1 do your homework bud. The receivers are nowhere near the thickness of the RSQ1 and aren’t machined as precisely as the RSQ1.
 
AntiqueArsenal said:
SLR and macabee are bastardized clones of the RSQ1 do your homework bud. The receivers are nowhere near the thickness of the RSQ1 and aren’t machined as precisely as the RSQ1.
Click to expand...

It appears that the RSQ1 is a knockoff of the SLR, based on the homework I did. Prove me wrong.

Can you share some sort of reference to this old patent with us?
 
captain.awt said:
It seems we have ourselves a competition. BigMasterShrek insists it be on crown land and we shoot over 1000 rounds. He says he only shoot over 1000 rounds when he goes out. So, he insists my rifle won’t make it past the first 100 rounds.
Any members from Ontario that are coming out? Also, BigMasterShrek only bas a spot where he can shoot to 150 yards. Any member is Ontario know where we can shoot to at least 500 yards?
Click to expand...

I shoot well over 1000 rounds per range trip, you are more than likely a friend of steven adler (antique arsenal which is why you got the one rsqueer 1 that actually runs ok, and why you are backing him up in this thread. also I never suggested that, I said 1000 rounds because I know for a fact its gonna start choking between 500-1000. realistically youre just trying to call peoples bluff but everyone knows youre not gonna fly across country, drive 3 hours into the bush and actually compete at something besides just sitting at a range so now your backpedaling.
 
Last edited:
Why does everyone think that "variant" means shared parts or design - Murray Smith said that even a bolt gun can be an AR variant, it has nothing to do with anything real, so bending over backwards to be a "Not an AR" is a bit hopeful. According to the guy who started the whole FRT thing, a Rem 700 can be an AR, so this sure as hell can.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom