Currently own both the LMT (16" MRP) and Norc (14.5") and put over 10k rounds through each. Advantages of an LMT over my Norky:
- vastly better fit and finish throughout with tighter tolerances
- much better quality components that should yield, on average, lower failure rates
- much better trigger (although the Norky smoothed out with use)
- slightly better inherrent accuracy of the rifle
- slightly better reliability (the LMT yet has to FTF and FTE)
In saying so, the Norky retails for $700 whereas a comparable LMT retails for more than double that. Is the LMT twice the rifle ? Maybe for some who demand bleeding edge performance, but the Norky is an excellent starter rifle that won't break the bank and still perform within 80% of the LMT. YMMV.
My suggestion: Take the cost of ammo into consideration and get what you can comfortably afford. Of-course, if budget permits, get the LMT and don't look back
