I heard they were prohib just because they had pistol grip, detach mag and flash hider.
Conservatives, believe it or not,
Grizz
I heard they were prohib just because they had pistol grip, detach mag and flash hider.
Because someone in the lab needs to validate their 90K a year "job" and that government pension...besides look how scary it is
Interesting. I heard about this trick when I was in army cadets, but nobody had ever actually seen it done, and I put it in the 'my friend's uncle's brother-in-law told him once...' kind of story. Did it actually make it a practical FA shooter, or did it just mean that one trigger pull emptied the mag?
Because above and beyond banning all firearms, the true end goal is to get rid of the minds that would own/use one.
That's what they're really after: The culture of independent thought, decision and action. The FAL (much like the AK in a sense) is very much an iconic symbol, more so than it is a functioning piece of metal. And because it is something that is recognized to be special/stand out/ gives guys something to have in common, it must be attacked and snuffed out.
Sure they don't like guns....but really, they don't like you! You think and act for yourself, are therefore not part of the "progressive plan" and therefore need to go.
Battlerife has it spot on. It sure used to be fun out shooting with my AK47 and 30 round mags.
The idea that it was because of ease of full auto conversion is a myth that needs to die. I wish people who have no idea what they are talking about would stop parroting it.
What should be obvious is that the FAL was in no way singled out. The government prohibited every semi-automatic, detachable mag centrefire rifle that came standard with a pistol grip, except the AR-15. They did it because they wanted to prohibit as many guns as they could (and probably all of them ultimately), and the government and media had managed to whip popular opinion to a strong stance against "assault weapons". Then they came up with a definition of "assualt weapon" as basically any semi-auto centrefire rifle with a pistol grip. Lobbying by the Dominion Rifle Canada group managed to get the AR-15 removed from the list, but everything else went away.
Anything you can buy now that meets the definition is available only because it came into the market after the 1995 ban, as the list was never updated.
than why can't we as canadian citizens demand they reevaluate and update the prohibited list.
The idea that it was because of ease of full auto conversion is a myth that needs to die. I wish people who have no idea what they are talking about would stop parroting it.
On January 1, 1995 the following guns were declared prohibited by a regulatory order:
...
What should be obvious is that the FAL was in no way singled out. The government prohibited every semi-automatic, detachable mag centrefire rifle that came standard with a pistol grip, except the AR-15. They did it because they wanted to prohibit as many guns as they could (and probably all of them ultimately), and the government and media had managed to whip popular opinion to a strong stance against "assault weapons". Then they came up with a definition of "assualt weapon" as basically any semi-auto centrefire rifle with a pistol grip. Lobbying by the Dominion Rifle Canada group managed to get the AR-15 removed from the list, but everything else went away.
Anything you can buy now that meets the definition is available only because it came into the market after the 1995 ban, as the list was never updated.
Of course it was done just because they wanted to, but you can easily use the excuse that it was easily convertible, which they will use and "prove" it as the reason that they banned it. In theory It isn't a difficult toy to convert, regardless of it's uselessness in full auto. Examples of Guns that would be better examples to use would be a SPAS 12 or calico rifle. I'd like to see their excuse for those two, other than terminator and total recall footage.