Got Juice?
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Peoples Republik of Kanukkistan
Worth the 1.5hr drive for me to go look at it!!!!!
Looks like KAC has some competition. Same price structure, but different materials![]()
Atleast that gun wouldn't need any of the coatings that aluminum needs, and looks uber-###y...
And the whole point of the Ti ONE was to draw attention, not mass-produce. Who else has an "all Titanium" AR ?
NEMO is only a 4 hr drive from me too. Hmmm... A new Nissan GT-R, or a titanium AR-10 ?
![]()
Being Ti doesn't really change how the tolerances are applied.With titanium, shouldn't they be able to manufacture it to rediculous tolerances, with very thin walls (Less material)?
I understand that this was a publicity thing, they weren't trying to reinvent the wheel, but I'm curious.
Being Ti doesn't really change how the tolerances are applied.
I do agree, though. That they should have been able to thin walls, such as around the mag well, FCG pocket, etc. I'm assuming they just took their aluminum model and changes the tool cut parameters and ran it. Ti is strong, but it's brittle. There really is no benefit to it's use in firearms, or many other markets, other than the illusion quality that the name Titanium gives. People are simple and like shiny things, that's about it.
Being Ti doesn't really change how the tolerances are applied.
I do agree, though. That they should have been able to thin walls, such as around the mag well, FCG pocket, etc. I'm assuming they just took their aluminum model and changes the tool cut parameters and ran it. Ti is strong, but it's brittle. There really is no benefit to it's use in firearms, or many other markets, other than the illusion of high quality that the name Titanium gives. People are simple and like shiny things, that's about it.
Wrong on many levels unfortunately, titanium like most metals has too many alloys and forms to describe it with sweeping statements like "it's brittle", when you read a post like the above all it tells you is the author is unfamiliar with the subject.
Brittle alloys are not used in racing engine connecting rods doing 14,000rpm, valves of the same, turbine engine blades spinning at 60,000rpm, golf club heads, airframe structural components that experience multiple severe load cycles, etc etc etc. Titanium makes extreme sense if used in firearms, but like any material it has to be used right. Replacing aluminum parts of the same dimension is not where it's going to shine.
Replace steel, and the difference is monumental, my titanium Mauser is 45% lighter than a steel action of the same dimension- and just as strong. That's incredible, and it's also entirely impervious to corrosion. In firearms, there are a million places where titanium replacing steel would be extremely advantageous, but the customer's pockets just aren't deep enough to justify it. Saying it's not suited to firearms and is just for people that like shiny things is amusing, truth is it's great for guns but not suited to buyers.
Being Ti doesn't really change how the tolerances are applied.
I do agree, though. That they should have been able to thin walls, such as around the mag well, FCG pocket, etc. I'm assuming they just took their aluminum model and changes the tool cut parameters and ran it. Ti is strong, but it's brittle. There really is no benefit to it's use in firearms, or many other markets, other than the illusion of high quality that the name Titanium gives. People are simple and like shiny things, that's about it.
$100,000 Retail.
$1 MILLION ON THE EE.