If you can shoot with both eyes open the low end magnification doesn't mean much.
O'Connor's view on big game scopes which is still relevant I believe -
![]()
![]()
If you can shoot with both eyes open the low end magnification doesn't mean much.
How many people do you know that put in the time to teach themselves to shoot with both eyes open?
How many people do you know that put in the time to teach themselves to shoot with both eyes open?
I have a fixed Leupold 3x M8 on my 9.3mm, and found out last week that it's not enough magnification. I spotted a nice buck across a meadow, and just for s&g, tried aiming at him just to see what I could see. Dark bodied buck against a dark background, belly deep in grass and in the shade: I could see him fine through the 8x30 Swaro's, but I couldn't see well enough through the 3x to have taken the shot if I'd wanted. Distance was 300 yds, or a bit over.
Now I'm shopping for a new scope with more magnification at the high end. I've never found 3x to be too much magnification, and I hunt in some pretty thick spots.
I have Zeiss Diavari 1.5-6 X 42 .
I have shot my fair share of deer and moose .
And I have not shot any game with the scope set at six power.
A challenging shot for sure at that distance on a Deer that's about 1/2 the size backbone to brisket compared to an Elk. O'Connor must have been thinking Elk or Moose when he stated 4x is sufficient out to 500 yards.
My eyes need the higher magnification to identify an immature moose from 100+ yards. If you are shooting mostly in thicker brush, then yes, I can see low mag being of benefit. To each their own needs.
A four power scope makes the animal appear to be 125 yards away. If you can successfully aim at a deer at 125 yds with iron sights, you can certainly aim at one at 500 yards.
This is especially true when you consider the scope puts everything in one focal plane, rather than at least two using iron sights.
Ted
My eyes need the higher magnification to identify an immature moose from 100+ yards. If you are shooting mostly in thicker brush, then yes, I can see low mag being of benefit. To each their own needs.




























