Wrong scope for the job!

I have a 3x9 on my 30-06 and never used more than 6x in hunting situation. You get also less perceived movement when aiming at game at lower power. I have downed game with that set up up to +/- 400 yards.
 
If you can shoot with both eyes open the low end magnification doesn't mean much.

I can shoot with both eyes open with magnification up to 4x.

Hunting can be done without high power scopes, and that's how I like it, but it's just a preference. If someone wants to take long shots they still have to spot the game and they need to have invested more in equipment and shooting practise that I do. Just different techniques, needing appropriate equipment.

Most of my scopes are low power fixed or variable, (2.5x, 1-3x, 4x, 6x, 1.5-6x) and most of my hunting has been done with those. The highest power scopes I have are a 3-9x and a 4-12x. I've used those at their max a couple times, but have never taken a shot I couldn't have taken with only 6x. I'm not taking shots anyone would call long.
 
O'Connor's view on big game scopes which is still relevant I believe -

38059925382_959bef9ac9_b.jpg


26314360139_f5ee76e7ab_b.jpg

I have a fixed Leupold 3x M8 on my 9.3mm, and found out last week that it's not enough magnification. I spotted a nice buck across a meadow, and just for s&g, tried aiming at him just to see what I could see. Dark bodied buck against a dark background, belly deep in grass and in the shade: I could see him fine through the 8x30 Swaro's, but I couldn't see well enough through the 3x to have taken the shot if I'd wanted. Distance was 300 yds, or a bit over.

Now I'm shopping for a new scope with more magnification at the high end. I've never found 3x to be too much magnification, and I hunt in some pretty thick spots.
 
How many people do you know that put in the time to teach themselves to shoot with both eyes open?

Amoung my shooting friends and family most of them shoot with both eyes open. In my own case it never even occurrred to me to close an eye. With my kids I just suggested they try it, that's all it took.

When people say that a 4X scope makes everything look 4 times the size that's probably true for them. What I see is a big old world with an X hanging in the middle of it. It looks a little closer but not much, just in sharp focus. Those very low power scopes makes everything look farther away. I'm not the only one.
 
Last edited:
I have a fixed Leupold 3x M8 on my 9.3mm, and found out last week that it's not enough magnification. I spotted a nice buck across a meadow, and just for s&g, tried aiming at him just to see what I could see. Dark bodied buck against a dark background, belly deep in grass and in the shade: I could see him fine through the 8x30 Swaro's, but I couldn't see well enough through the 3x to have taken the shot if I'd wanted. Distance was 300 yds, or a bit over.

Now I'm shopping for a new scope with more magnification at the high end. I've never found 3x to be too much magnification, and I hunt in some pretty thick spots.

A challenging shot for sure at that distance on a Deer that's about 1/2 the size backbone to brisket compared to an Elk. O'Connor must have been thinking Elk or Moose when he stated 4x is sufficient out to 500 yards.

35569675692_08629c9879_z.jpg
 
I always bring two guns. 45-70 with a reciever peep and firesight post for close, 300 win mag with 3x9 or 4x12 for reaching out.
 
I have Zeiss Diavari 1.5-6 X 42 .
I have shot my fair share of deer and moose .
And I have not shot any game with the scope set at six power.

I have this one too. It's a real gem.

The most versatile scope I have is a March 2.5-25x42. Talk about superb glass, compactness and engineering.
 
Just bought a Bushnell 6500 2.5-16x40. which will replace a 4.5-14 x44 on my. 300i Win Mag. Best of both worlds.
 
Or consider that when calling in Moose or Elk the shot will be at very close range. How convenient - wouldn't require higher magnifications at all. The lower power settings of my Bushnell Legend Ultra HD 1.75-5x32mm that's on my .45-70 Marlin will work just fine.

37388359294_42f4996a89_b.jpg
 
A challenging shot for sure at that distance on a Deer that's about 1/2 the size backbone to brisket compared to an Elk. O'Connor must have been thinking Elk or Moose when he stated 4x is sufficient out to 500 yards.

A four power scope makes the animal appear to be 125 yards away. If you can successfully aim at a deer at 125 yds with iron sights, you can certainly aim at one at 500 yards.

This is especially true when you consider the scope puts everything in one focal plane, rather than at least two using iron sights.

Ted
 
It's not too often that I switch a scope from one rifle to another rifle. And if I do then I know that I'll have some work to do in re-dialing the scope in on the new rifle... I do think that buying the best glass one can - is a great idea because the clarity brings dividends in low light situations... Also good - is to never cheap out on cheap rings as there is a quality difference and the better rings usually do not require any significant lapping of the rings.

For hunting application - the mid priced scopes are where the best bang for the $ invested. Also I like good eye relief an the purchase of a scope is not brand specific - but is decided based on the eye relief. If one does not have decent eye relief (and clarity) then changing powers during a hunt will be noticeable. And a crucial opportunity may only happen one or twice during the hunting season.

So my best advice is to go to a shop where one can look through scopes where outdoor settings can be seen right outside the shop. And compare a few options, like power levels and pick the one that will best reflect where and how the scope will be used.
 
1.25-8x32 Elite 6500
1.5-5x20 Leupold VXIII
3-9x40 Zeiss

Those are the power ranges I have used on big game rifles.

Like others have said, it depends on your hunting situation... Wide open prairie rifles need more powerful glass than thick woods rifles...

Cheers
Jay
 
A four power scope makes the animal appear to be 125 yards away. If you can successfully aim at a deer at 125 yds with iron sights, you can certainly aim at one at 500 yards.

This is especially true when you consider the scope puts everything in one focal plane, rather than at least two using iron sights.

Ted

Iron sights on Deer-sized game at 125 yards? I wouldn't be confident to take the shot because I'm accustomed to, or rather, dependent on using scopes. ;)

I used a 1-3x scope on my SKS set at 3x to down a Mulie at approximately 300 yards so that's equivalent to 1x at 100 yards. It was an older Weaver scope with amazingly sharp and bright optics which made that shot easier. :cool:
 
Last edited:
My eyes need the higher magnification to identify an immature moose from 100+ yards. If you are shooting mostly in thicker brush, then yes, I can see low mag being of benefit. To each their own needs.

...... hoping you are not always pointing your rifle at things you need to identify. Maybe you need to retake the CORE Course.
 
Back
Top Bottom