Your opinion: Sig P320RX or Canik TP9SFX

I have the TP9SFx (topped with a Vortex Venom) and it's crazy accurate with a great trigger. The only mod it needs is a lighter recoil spring assembly to reliably feed minor power factor competition loads.

Be aware, though, that the Canik TP9SFx is not legal in IPSC Production Optics class, and there's no way a polymer-framed gun will be anywhere near competitive in Open. Not sure where it fits into the IDPA scheme of things...
 
I have the TP9SFx (topped with a Vortex Venom) and it's crazy accurate with a great trigger. The only mod it needs is a lighter recoil spring assembly to reliably feed minor power factor competition loads.

Be aware, though, that the Canik TP9SFx is not legal in IPSC Production Optics class, and there's no way a polymer-framed gun will be anywhere near competitive in Open. Not sure where it fits into the IDPA scheme of things...

Ooohhh....
Guess I should have a closer look at the IPSC qualifications in case I ever want to go that route. Thanks for that!
 
Absolutely put both pistols in your hand and judge. A lot of Glock lovers out there and I want to love them too but when I pick them up they feel ####ed up in my hand. Sig P226 feels like it was made for me. Don't buy before you touch.
 
As others have said the Q5 Match will fit the Vortex red dots using the Doctor plate.

The Canik should fit in the IDPA box without the Optic. It doesn;t fit in the IPSC box.

IDPA still has not decided on how they will deal with the size of Optic mounted pistols. It would make sense to ignore the height of the guns with the Optic mounted and just decide on what size of pistol you want in the Division. FS or Compact. To garner any amount of interest I would suggest they use the FS pistol as their benchmark based on SSP requirements. If they don't there would be little or no activity in Canada in the division. We shall see what IDPA God decides. Look for an answer in the coming months.

My bet, that I would not make, would be they go FS guns, and stick with SSP requirements as opposed to ESP. The latter rule set would give IDPA a quazzi OPen division and I doubt the powers that be want that.

I have already made my decision but for personal reasons not solely based on my desire to compete. For anyone looking at setting up a rig for IDPA or wants to shoot both IDPA and IPSC, neither sport has firmed up their rule set, yet. IPSC as I understand it won't make their decision until next year. IDPA says in the coming months. In Canada, IPSC has gone Production Optics, meaning any gun on the Approved Production list is approved now for participation in Canada. Sean might want to voice his opinion as to whether this will carry the vote next year or not.

If IDPA goes with the present FS box requirements, ignoring the height limitation when the gun has a mounted Optic both the Walther PPQ Q5 Match and the Canik would be legal. Considering the ongoing difficulties recently with writing rule books I would not bet as to how the final decision will come down. I doubt many would argue with that assessment.

Take care

Bob
 
No doubt the Q5 match is a darling however, the gun by itself with no optic is more $$$$ than a fully equipped P320RX or TP9SFX with a Vortex Venom. That's getting a bit outside my current "casually terrorizing paper" budget.

And for Sailor723, Vortex and Burris have the same mounting pattern as Doctor, (and are half the price...).

freaking coffee just came out my nose when i snort laughed when reading that, haha!
 
the only thing i dont like about the Canik is that you loose the rear sites when you put a optic on it.
im old i know but i just gotta have those nice tall sites to co-witness.
hard to untrain myself to not look for the sites after all these years.

S&W CORE is what i went with with a Leopold on it.
but that Canik is a sweet gun, my dad picked one up.
 
the only thing i dont like about the Canik is that you loose the rear sites when you put a optic on it.
im old i know but i just gotta have those nice tall sites to co-witness.
hard to untrain myself to not look for the sites after all these years.

S&W CORE is what i went with with a Leopold on it.
but that Canik is a sweet gun, my dad picked one up.

Ya, losing the co-witness sights is a factor with me too. Call me old fashioned, but batteries seem to die at the first sight of a zombie...
Your the second to recommend the CORE, guess I'm getting too hung up on the V2.0 releases? V1 can probably outshoot me anyway!

Loved your post on the takedown .22's by the way, (and sorry I turned your coffee into snot ;)
 
I'm asking myself the exact same questions as the OP and I too appreciate the responses.

Note that both the Canik TP9SFX and the Walther PPQ M2 Q5 Match lose cowitnessing when you mount an optic as they use a similar system such that the normal dovetail for the rear sight is on its own plate. Right now, all I'm seeing on the market for this problem is to go with a Leupold DeltaPoint where you can attach their optional rear sight to the DeltaPoint itself.

Also note that the Canik has a trigger pull of under 5 lbs whereas the PPQ Q5 is just over 5. If one intends to use the Canik without an optic, it won't qualify for the IPSC Production Division without some trigger modification.
 
I'm asking myself the exact same questions as the OP and I too appreciate the responses.

Note that both the Canik TP9SFX and the Walther PPQ M2 Q5 Match lose cowitnessing when you mount an optic as they use a similar system such that the normal dovetail for the rear sight is on its own plate. Right now, all I'm seeing on the market for this problem is to go with a Leupold DeltaPoint where you can attach their optional rear sight to the DeltaPoint itself.

Also note that the Canik has a trigger pull of under 5 lbs whereas the PPQ Q5 is just over 5. If one intends to use the Canik without an optic, it won't qualify for the IPSC Production Division without some trigger modification.

I believe the Canik won't qualify for IPSC Production anyway due to slide/barrel length.
 
the Canick mentioned is not on the OPSC Production List. The batteries are supposed to be good for thousands of hours so I don;t think that should be an issue. Aside from breaking the sight itself the need for co-witnessing is just not there. The slide mounted Optic sights have been around for awhile and aside from the CORE model by S&W most have been mounted on dovetail mounts which means no co-witness yet the Optic sight has become very popular in steel matches where thousands of rounds are fired every week-end. I think my take away is the need is just not there for co-witness.

Take Care

Bob
 
Back
Top Bottom