Same sized projectile, but 9mm is usually double the velocity of .38 special, and don't even think of .38 S&W... Twice the velocity means far more impact.
It's the shooter who makes the biggest difference, not the caliber of the round.
38+p and/or 357 mag? I'm thinking any 357 mag load will out pace any 9mm. Correct me if I am wrong.
Comparing 9mm and 45 is like comparing 5.56 and 7.62. Two different animals, both have their uses.
M
so if the identical shooter was using both then which caliber is better?It's the shooter who makes the biggest difference, not the caliber of the round.
so if the identical shooter was using both then which caliber is better?
The conflict was resolved back in the 80's, when the .40 S&W was developed for the FBI
The advance in JHP bullet design, has recently prompted the FBI go back to 9mm.
That same JHP bullet design, is available in .40S&W, so better then, is still better now, I would think.
Recoil, thus follow up shots, appear to be the deciding factor. I fully respect the decision of those who's azzes are on the line!!
If the shooter was a Tier 1, Mossad, Spetznaz Bruce Lee dude, then a .22LR thru the eye socket is more than plenty.
If the shooter was your avg. Libtard vegan, then a 40mm Bofor from 20 ft just might do it...but not with a 5 rd limit.
L
One famous shoot out dictated the caliber choice for the FBI. Initially they decided to use the full bore 10 mm round due to it so called knock down magnum like power, however it became a hand full to every agent sans the highly trained. After many complaints SMith and Wesson promoted a shorter less powerful 10 mm round which was designated 40 SW to keep the Americans familiar with the non metric rounds. However this is a over pressure round that is hard on re acquiring the target and contributing to gun failures.
Total
Still![]()
Many articles on this, you should do some research.
http://youtu.be/4C3VE-ylhWw
https://www.forgottenweapons.com/the-1986-fbi-gunfight-and-adoption-of-the-10mm-auto/
If you did some searching you would have educated yourself on the true reason for the 40. It was another failed attempt at finding a caliber to replace both the 9 and 45. Proper traing with the standard of the time would have led to a better outcome, however it was easier to blame the weapon caliber.I did ample research, much more than two internet pages, long before this post was begun.
You took the liberty of embellishing the facts, for some unknown reason, which is why I called HS.
If you did some searching you would have educated yourself on the true reason for the 40. It was another failed attempt at finding a caliber to replace both the 9 and 45. Proper traing with the standard of the time would have led to a better outcome, however it was easier to blame the weapon caliber.
There are zero hand gun Calibers out there that will end a confrontation quickly, unless a brain or spinal shot hits home. IMHO the 9 is the superior cartridge due to its multiple shot controllability for both an inexperienced and professional operator. The 45 is another fine round that requires some work to double tap. The 40, well is a wannabe caliber that can be a handful for any shooter.
...........and 9mm won...
Assuming you had to buy your own pistol and ammunition (type of your choice) for combined self-defense and self-defense range training use, which caliber would you choose, 9x19mm Parabellum, .357 Sig, .38 super, .40 S&W, 10mm or .45 ACP ?...
so if the identical shooter was using both then which caliber is better?