Precision/Sniper/Tactical

bacardi said:
I did use tape measurement and input the measurement on the website. I wonder if SP4001 will not clear the barrel and SP4002 will have too much room. Has anyone ever used the calculator? Is there a way to be sure if I don't have the scope yet to try it on the rifle? I am trying to order it at the same time with the scope to save shipping.
Click to expand...

Stack playing cards until flush with top of rail from handguard. That is how much more height you can "add" to the rings.
 
AIAT 308 also have the 6.5 Creedmoor quick change barrel
With the thumbhole stockside to get the classic AI look.
DSC_0438 - Copy.jpg

And with the factory pistol grip
image.jpg
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0438 - Copy.jpg
    DSC_0438 - Copy.jpg
    66.9 KB · Views: 932
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    84.7 KB · Views: 920
3of30 said:
AIAT 308 also have the 6.5 Creedmoor quick change barrel
With the thumbhole stockside to get the classic AI look.
View attachment 56974

And with the factory pistol grip
View attachment 56975
Click to expand...

Definitely prefer the classic thumbhole stock too.
I own 2 AWSM and love them so much.
If you look for the new AI factory bipod in black for your AT, let me know (PM) as I have a brand new one for sale.
 
Colquhoun said:
Wow....that's a beauty! Awesome reputation goes along with those rifles..
How long did you have to wait for that?
Click to expand...

Thanks! The rifle took about 2 years to build, but during that time Mike R. suffered a major health setback and issues from one of his suppliers, so it's usually not quite that long of a wait.

This is the most beautiful rifle I have ever had the pleasure of seeing with my own eyes and holding in my hands. I started shooting a lot of competitions this year, and I have been around a lot of really high end rifles: PGW, AI, GAP's, Surgeons, SAC, Stuteville customs, etc., and nothing really compares. Hell my match rifle is a GAP, which I really like, but there's something about this TacOps rifle. The attention to detail is insane, and I never could have imagined a remington 700 action feeling this good! This rifle truly is more than just the sum of its parts.

Unfortunately according to the members of CGN remington 700 actions just aren't as accurate as rifles built off of custom actions, so I guess I shouldn't get my hopes up for accuracy:p...
 
kthomas said:
Thanks! The rifle took about 2 years to build, but during that time Mike R. suffered a major health setback and issues from one of his suppliers, so it's usually not quite that long of a wait.

This is the most beautiful rifle I have ever had the pleasure of seeing with my own eyes and holding in my hands. I started shooting a lot of competitions this year, and I have been around a lot of really high end rifles: PGW, AI, GAP's, Surgeons, SAC, Stuteville customs, etc., and nothing really compares. Hell my match rifle is a GAP, which I really like, but there's something about this TacOps rifle. The attention to detail is insane, and I never could have imagined a remington 700 action feeling this good! This rifle truly is more than just the sum of its parts.

Unfortunately according to the members of CGN remington 700 actions just aren't as accurate as rifles built off of custom actions, so I guess I shouldn't get my hopes up for accuracy:p...
Click to expand...

You're probably right. My guess is about 12moa with FGMM. I'll take it off your hands so you don't embarrass yourself at the range.
 
kthomas said:
Unfortunately according to the members of CGN remington 700 actions just aren't as accurate as rifles built off of custom actions, so I guess I shouldn't get my hopes up for accuracy:p...
Click to expand...

Ssshhhhh, don't tell my .223, 260 or .308 customs built off Rem 700's that they are not able to go out and play with my Barnards, PGW's or TRG !

Seriously, that TacOps is simply awesome. Congrats on owning such a nice rifle.
 
bsand said:
Stack playing cards until flush with top of rail from handguard. That is how much more height you can "add" to the rings.
Click to expand...

This what it looks like with SP4002. It looks like there is plenty room to go lower. I took this picture few weeks ago. Just got a time to post it now. Should I go with SP4001?

 
Mister Donut said:
My pal used a lower mount for is TRG-22 (not a flat top), though I'm not sure if he used the 30m or 34mm tall mount:

http://2.bp.########.com/-tkn0U697m3o/U5U2ovw4T8I/AAAAAAAAT30/BnOCaK303Ag/s1600/DSCN6662.JPG
Click to expand...

Misterdonut, are you able to ask your friend the height of the mount? I am told that if I go lower, the"belly" of the scope will hit the mount.
 
bacardi said:
Misterdonut, are you able to ask your friend the height of the mount? I am told that if I go lower, the"belly" of the scope will hit the mount.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I asked and he definitely had the SP4001.

Specs from the website:

Model No: SP-4001
Ring size: 34 mm
Height: 30mm/1.18"
Length: 121mm/4.76"
Cant: 0Mil/0MOA


Looks like there's still a little wiggle room between the Schmidt and the TRG-22.
 
Mister Donut said:
Yeah, I asked and he definitely had the SP4001.

Specs from the website:

Model No: SP-4001
Ring size: 34 mm
Height: 30mm/1.18"
Length: 121mm/4.76"
Cant: 0Mil/0MOA


Looks like there's still a little wiggle room between the Schmidt and the TRG-22.
Click to expand...

So I measured the space between the "belly" of the scope and the mount and it is about 0.3 to 0.35 cm. I have to buy the mount to try it on. Wish I know someone who has one for me to try.

What is the con of having a scope mount that is not low enough? The difference between SP4001 and SP4002 is 0.04 mm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom