The "balance" of nature is a myth. Nature isn't a balance, it's a teeter-totter. When prey numbers are high, predator numbers start to rise. At some point the predator numbers become so high that the prey population collapses, with predator numbers soon to follow. You can see this on a miniature scale with the snowshoe hare and ruffed grouse. I believe the hare cycle is roughly seven years. With larger prey the cycle is more prolonged.
I remember in the seventies, when I first started hunting in Ontario, it was a rare thrill to see a deer track. Numbers were way down. The season was shortened to one week, bucks only, and by the early 80's the population started to rebound. Coyote numbers followed.
I have no interest in returning to the lean years of the 70's. I don't hunt specifically for canids, but I will shoot every one I can lay crosshairs on. And I will unabashedly say it's about removing competition and protecting the resource I wish to use myself.
The wolf has been extinct in the USA for a hundred years (except a few states) by man. They where on an extermination process because of a few livestock attacks and they wanted more big game to shoot.
They would not stop killing the wolf until.it was gone from most states this is an ignorant mentality which I hope does not take hold in canada.
The wolf is a hated and misunderstood animal Imo.
in the 70s there were no coyotes in southern mb. it was all fox. the first coyotes started showing up in the 80 and by the 90s they were everywhere. you have to remember fox and wolves coexist quite well, wolf and coyotes do not. you remover the wolf from mnost of north America and the coyote moves north from the Arizona desert to fill the vacuum.
any serious trapper should know who o'gorman is, I have one of hos catalogues here from 89 or early 90s I believe, and there's more than a few mentions of how coyotes progressed northward. fox took nothing but a 1.5 coilspring to consistently catch. coyotes showed up ever increasingly northward and simply destroy many of those 70s and 80s fox traps. trappers had to substantially beef up equipment. my mother still remembers the first coyote caught in her general area by her brother in the 80s. no one had ever seen one before.
The "balance" of nature is a myth. Nature isn't a balance, it's a teeter-totter. When prey numbers are high, predator numbers start to rise. At some point the predator numbers become so high that the prey population collapses, with predator numbers soon to follow. You can see this on a miniature scale with the snowshoe hare and ruffed grouse. I believe the hare cycle is roughly seven years. With larger prey the cycle is more prolonged.
I remember in the seventies, when I first started hunting in Ontario, it was a rare thrill to see a deer track. Numbers were way down. The season was shortened to one week, bucks only, and by the early 80's the population started to rebound. Coyote numbers followed.
I have no interest in returning to the lean years of the 70's. I don't hunt specifically for canids, but I will shoot every one I can lay crosshairs on. And I will unabashedly say it's about removing competition and protecting the resource I wish to use myself.
You can call it a teeter totter if you like, but it is the way natures balance works.
Poor deer populations at those times, had little to do with predator numbers. Coyote numbers were down then as well, as we're wolf numbers.
Shooting wolves and coyotes just because they interfere with YOUR chosen animal to hunt, is selfish, short sighted, and the reason we're in the mess we're in.
do some research on what the introduced wolves have done the last 10 years to the vast elk herds of the western us. tell me if you want them managed or not? if your anti hunting you will love the fact that wolves bring game populations down so far that they have to close hunting seasons. remember the caribou heard in bc the antis went nuts over when the government started killing wolves from planes? if they wouldn't have than that heard would be gone. forever. also you will never make wolves extinct using guns, steel traps and snares. you will only take a small amount and put the fear of man into them which is required unless you want them eating your cattle and children. wolves were pushed back in the early days using poison. very effective. also aerial gunning was used later on.
Actually Moosehead, shooting wolves and coyotes to increase game animals is the way nature works...wolves kill other wolves, coyotes and bears to protect their chosen home ground area game numbers....humans are only returning the favour.
Shooting wolves and coyotes just because they interfere with YOUR chosen animal to hunt, is selfish, short sighted, and the reason we're in the mess we're in.
So then how did they become extirpated in most of the continental US? Also, where in North America have wolves eaten children?
exactly. 100 times more effective than shooting trapping and snaring. poison was often dropped from planes. and yes wolves have killed humans in north America. and Europe and Asia. coyotes have killed humans in north America!!! the antis do there best to have it called something else such as the incident in sask. or it its unconfirmed as they say......Strychnine and arsenic were widely used.
Also, where in North America have wolves eaten children?
List of wolf attacks in North America said:In 1778 John Pencil, a Tory, caught his brother Henry fleeing with other Patriots to Monocacy Island, and murdered him as a rebel. After the Tories were driven out in 1780, John Pencil moved from Tryon County, New York to Canada (present-day Ontario). He was attacked there by wolves three different times. The Indians rescued him the first two times, but seeing him as wicked and cursed for killing his brother, they told him they would not help him a third time. John Pencil was attacked a third time by wolves, and having no rescuers, he was torn to pieces.
B.C., Alberta, and Alaska, have all conducted wolf culls in the recent past, if not currently. Why is it ok for a government to shoot wolves ( to protect a resource ), but not ok for me to do the same as an individual? The impact I have, as an individual, hunting on foot, will be miniscule compared organized culls conducted from the air.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/wolf-cull-save-elk-moose-1.3450522
exactly. 100 times more effective than shooting trapping and snaring. poison was often dropped from planes. and yes wolves have killed humans in north America. and Europe and Asia. coyotes have killed humans in north America!!! the antis do there best to have it called something else such as the incident in sask. or it its unconfirmed as they say......