freezer filler
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
- Location
- Windsor, Ontario
What a crock !
Can't believe that silly argument is even on this thread..
I have to agree it's a silly argument... if I can get an extra 200 fps out of a 20" barrel.
What a crock !
Can't believe that silly argument is even on this thread..
And the funny thing is.......you know it's true![]()

Yep - there are a few cartridges that, even after over 100 years, we have not been able to improve on or replace: 22 LR, 6.5X55, 30-30, 375 H&H come to mind.
How many times have we done this?
And I can't remember what I put the last time lol.
This time I think I'd go with .22-250 for varmints and the odd deer/antelope
.280rem for most all med/ big game
And since we need 3 maybe a . .28 nosler or 26nosler for the ones that I can't get close too.
How many times have we done this?
And I can't remember what I put the last time lol.
This time I think I'd go with .22-250 for varmints and the odd deer/antelope
.280rem for most all med/ big game
And since we need 3 maybe a . .28 nosler or 26nosler for the ones that I can't get close too.
Yeah, just like the 300 H&H continued on strong when the 300 WM was introduced.
Oh, wait.....
![]()
Gatehouse explain to me where i mentioned the .375H&H being a better cartridge than the .375 Ruger, what i said was.....it is my firm belief that the .375 Ruger in the next 100 years will not surpass the H&H in class prestige or even game harvested , never said the H&H is better........you jumping the gun![]()
I think if I did a lot of big game hunting, all over the world, and could have only 1 gun, it would be a 375 H&H, built on an FN action, with battue sights. Yes, there are more modern calibers that surpass it in terms of ballistics, but with 105 years of extremely solid and reliable performance, I don't think anything can match it. You can use it from deer-sized to elephant-sized game, at ranges from point-blank to 400 yards. And you know the ammo wil always be available, whereas the same can't be said for some other 375's.
I think if I did a lot of big game hunting, all over the world, and could have only 1 gun, it would be a 375 H&H, built on an FN action, with battue sights. Yes, there are more modern calibers that surpass it in terms of ballistics, but with 105 years of extremely solid and reliable performance, I don't think anything can match it. You can use it from deer-sized to elephant-sized game, at ranges from point-blank to 400 yards. And you know the ammo wil always be available, whereas the same can't be said for some other 375's.
I think if I did a lot of big game hunting, all over the world, and could have only 1 gun, it would be a 375 H&H, built on an FN action, with battue sights. Yes, there are more modern calibers that surpass it in terms of ballistics, but with 105 years of extremely solid and reliable performance, I don't think anything can match it. You can use it from deer-sized to elephant-sized game, at ranges from point-blank to 400 yards. And you know the ammo wil always be available, whereas the same can't be said for some other 375's.
Gatehouse explain to me where i mentioned the .375H&H being a better cartridge than the .375 Ruger, what i said was.....it is my firm belief that the .375 Ruger in the next 100 years will not surpass the H&H in class prestige or even game harvested , never said the H&H is better........you jumping the gun![]()




























