Chiappa vs Rossi 44 Mag

Scrumbag

Regular
Rating - 0%
0   0   0
Hi folks,

I'm thinking of a 20" barrelled 44 mag for hunting.

Anyone got any experience of Rossi vs Chiappa 44 Mags?

Scrummy
 
If you get the Rossi, try to get the big loop. I made the mistake of getting the regular, recoil jams the lever into my middle finger, not an issue on the big loops I have shot.
The gun itself is alright not pretty, but as accurate as any 92 pattern I guess and is great on the SxS as a heater bush gun. The annoying thing is the safety, which some people remove.
 
Thanks Galt,

Is good to know. I quite fancy the Chiappa Alaskan but is about 50% more than a Rossi over here.

Scrummy
 
Rossi 92's action that I got was smooth right out of the box. Safety switch not really an issue for me. I changed the rear sights to a Skinner peep sight.

I hand load so recoil is decent. I've got the small loop, one thing I need to do is do some lever wrapping on it to protect the knuckles when working the lever.
 
Hi Roadcarver,

Yes I'd heard that some are fine (The safety doesn't bother me so much) just I'm not a particular expert on levers (not a lot of expertise over here) so wouldn't feel that confident if I did have to slick it up.

Scrummy
 
Hi Roadcarver,

Yes I'd heard that some are fine (The safety doesn't bother me so much) just I'm not a particular expert on levers (not a lot of expertise over here) so wouldn't feel that confident if I did have to slick it up.

Scrummy

An evening of John Wayne , bottle of single malt...smooths it out. Click click click clack click clack..
 
I had a Rossi 38 Spl/357 Mag lever action. What a nice rifle! Good quality wood stock and nicely finished steel. It was very accurate with open V sights.
 
I am wondering the same thing, but specifically which one handles cast bullets better. Many .44 magnum carbines have oversized bores, .421"-.423" and don't handle cast bullets well unless they are made with a custom oversize mould. I have tried a Browning 92 and a Marlin and both had loose bores and I had problems shooting cast bullets with both. For me, the fit and finish of the Chiappa is worth the extra cost, but wonder how they shoot.
 
Was just going to mention my Rossi .44 has an oversized barrel. It shoots plated and jacketed fine. Although it shoots quite high, even with the rear sight on lowest notch, I've heard this with another owner(use lighter charged ammo or adjust accordingly). Never had any problems with action. Safety is what it is. My front sight post fell out, possibly my fault, it get banged around. Kicks hard, the butt plate doesn't do any favors, solid, it'd knock teeth out. I like it that way though..

It's worth the money I'd say. If you want a nicer fit an finish, splurge. There's so many nice 92s I'd get a Winchester, (drools)
 
Longwalker and others, S.A.A.M.I. spec's for 44 magnum rifle bores is .432 I believe. The two Browning 92's I had shot best at .434 dia.Also it is throat dia. not bore dia. that is the critical factor.
 
I've owned 2 rossi's, and still have a 24" octagon barrel 92 in .44 mag that is great. Great guns when I paid $525 a couple years ago, but I'm not sure I'd pay the $1000 they're asking nowadays, but I'd never sell the one I have and can't imagine hunting without it.
 
Back
Top Bottom