*UPDATE- RELEASED !!!* NEW .22 from DLASK ARMS CORP.
- Thread starter Dlask Arms
- Start date
That is why I asked if it fits into the same stocks as the Ruger 10-22. Best to think like thieves to thwart them than to end up robbed...
Should this be moved to the politics forum if you want to discuss this further? Let's not bog down this cool item that DLASK is offering.
By your way of thinking and if you want to entice the RCMP into this, you are throwing all of us firearm owners under the bus.
I will purchase a DLASK TUF-22 when it is available.
By your way of thinking and if you want to entice the RCMP into this, you are throwing all of us firearm owners under the bus.
I will purchase a DLASK TUF-22 when it is available.
crasheralex
Regular
- Location
- Cambridge, On
This guy gets it.
I'll be grabbing a striped receiver or 2 to change my 10/22's over.
Question:will current mags fit in the magwell aswell? Or only the new mags?
Why the hell should it matter if a magazine design created in 1964 and then a pistol created to use those magazines in 2007, 43 years later, suddenly require the magazines to be considered 'designed to be dual-purpose' and this be pinned to a maximum of 10 rounds as per pistol regulations?
I think what Dlask Arms is doing is AMAZING!!! I am evening thinking of buying a barrelled TUF-22 action to replace the 10/22 heavy barrel I have (already upgraded trigger). However, it's going to really pi$$ me off it to invest in half a dozen 25 round magazines that will have to be pinned to 10 rounds as well because the RCMP decides it matters.
I am asking for an answer to the devil's advocate question to be considered so we don't all get f#&ked over by the RCMP yet again.
At the very least so I know if my whole 10/22 is only going to swap over the upgraded bolt and trigger, and not the stock.
"Once the RCMP issue the FRT for this new rifle (submitted already) we will be able to sell these, so please be patient until then."
Why all the debate on legality, just wait until the process is completed and buy or not buy, sometimes some of the comments on this forum are so frustrating to read !!!
Why all the debate on legality, just wait until the process is completed and buy or not buy, sometimes some of the comments on this forum are so frustrating to read !!!
You really think everything is over once the rcmp issues an FRT? If it was true, we'd still have butler creek 25rnd magazines for the 10-22.
The rcmp will do what the rcmp will do, regardless of this forum. I'm not throwing anyone under any bus, merely stating that once someone registers a tuf22 pistol (which would take 22 seconds to make using a charger stock and a hacksaw), the 15 and 25 rnds mags will be prohibited. Or at least, the rcmp will say they're prohibited (I disagree on the original 10-22 mags, it'll be up for debate for the tuf22 mags).
Don't get me wrong everyone, I think dlask's intention are good here, but I also think everyone underestimates how much the rcmp will see this as an open defiance of the BC magazine ban and will act accordingly.
The only hope at this point is that the CSSA's court action wins over the rcmp (I think they will). However, it'll take years for that decision, and should the CSSA win, the rcmp will turn to politicians to change the law, to something that might be even more drastic (I easily see all rimfire magazines capped at 10 rounds, period).
There's no end to how much the rcmp lab can scr*w us. They don't need to read this forum, they can have bad ideas by themselves.
Nice! Holding off on my next build to see where this goes.
What is the rail, 0 MOA, 20 MOA? Will there be options on what type of rail comes on it or will only one type of rail be available?
Will this be sold as a complete rifle and as a stripped receiver?
Does the receiver have a hole in the rear so the barrel can be cleaned from the breech end without removing the barrel from the receiver?
What is the rail, 0 MOA, 20 MOA? Will there be options on what type of rail comes on it or will only one type of rail be available?
Will this be sold as a complete rifle and as a stripped receiver?
Does the receiver have a hole in the rear so the barrel can be cleaned from the breech end without removing the barrel from the receiver?
crasheralex
Regular
- Location
- Cambridge, On
Why would it be registered as a pistol tho? When people make rifles and shotguns into short barreled, pistol griped guns they don't become pistols. They just get registered as a restricted version of themselves.
I swear to god some of you guys would argue that is was nighttime at noon on a cloudy day. I will be buying one of these new rifles. The reason there are so many new non restricted black rifles in Canada is because they were designed, or fall within the current guidelines for non restricted rifles. Of course the RCMP can change the rules whenever they want but presently these rifles and mags fall within the current rules. All guns could be banned tomorrow with a stroke of a pen but that won't stop me from buying guns today.
Last edited:
Kyledempsey1
CGN Regular
- Location
- Nova Scotia
They are available without a rail. drilled and tapped for a factory rail as well . There's 2 versions a flat top that is tapped for factory rail but will not fit into a clamshell type stock like the archangel 556 this one is listed on their website. and then there is one that is the same dimensions as the factory receiver but it's not listed on their website you have to call and order
https://dlaskarms.com/collections/10-22-sr-22-dar-22-parts/products/dar-22-flat-top-receiver-7075-t6
Last edited:
Kyledempsey1
CGN Regular
- Location
- Nova Scotia
take a hacksaw to your barrel and you will have a prohibited rifle pretty quick. Put a 8 inch barrel on your tuf22 and as long as you are over 26 inches you have a short barrel rifle non restricted. Throw a charger stock on your short barrel tuff22 then you have a restricted short barrel rifle.
For it to be registered as a pistol - it'd need a new FRT!
What you're describing is the common restricted rifle which some 10/22 were long before the chargers ever showed up
Actually, if you took a hacksaw to the stock to lessen the length below 26", it'd be prohibited
