NEA/BCL 102 FAQ Thread

If it is a Milspec buffer tube, then you you can put another milspec butt stock on it, even with the added lenght

If it is longer than milspec... It isn't milspec.

While it's been asked, and people keep saying it is milspec, but longer, I'd love to know exactly what the length is vs a standard 308 buffer tube. I'm looking at a specific stock option, and the extension length is a go^nogo concern.
 
If it is longer than milspec... It isn't milspec.

While it's been asked, and people keep saying it is milspec, but longer, I'd love to know exactly what the length is vs a standard 308 buffer tube. I'm looking at a specific stock option, and the extension length is a go^nogo concern.

Its a standard AR10 buffer tube. So not an AR15 buffer tube like the AR308 rifles use. They aren't as common, but are found easily enough.

https://forum.308ar.com/topic/10133-buffers-receiver-extensions-stocks-and-springs/
 
So no magpul stocks then? I don't see any 308 milspec options on their site. I was really hoping to put some OD furniture on my black 102. :(

The collapsible ones should work, and as long as you have the 308 PRS model you should be fine. The collapsible ones just wont collapse as far since the buffer tube is longer.
 
I understand that, what i dont understand, is certain members here are trying VERY hard to link the NEA102 to the AR15...are these people trying to get RCMP's opinion of NR overturned? To what end are they continually coming out with "well, duuh, i just dont see a difference between the 102 and an AR15...deerp"

The problem is that people are trying to use common sense and show the RCMP firearms lab that if these two firearms are nearly identical in form and function that they should both have the same classification. The problem is that the firearms lab has about as much common sense and rational thinking capability as an angry woman in the middle of a divorce does. These people don't realize that they are throwing the new rifle under the AR-15 bus and hoping they both come out the back as non restricted, what is far more likely to happen and what most of us already understand is that both rifles are going to come out the back as restricted and there would really be nothing we can do to go back to just one being restricted.

People, stop thinking with common sense when trying to explain the firearms lab decisions, they are Lieberal so they aren't capable of rational thought.

afer many years I have come to a conclusion, it is simple, really. lots of retards here

On this site we all take a turns being the one someone thinks of that way, even you bud.
 
Last edited:
I don't want to see range reports, I wanna see people shooting from their backyards (if big enough) or out in the back 40... where this baby belongs.

She was born to be free. Free of restrictions...(well, most).
 
Question.. will anything be changed on the guns at all with the new BCL takeover? Furniture, serials, or proprietary parts made in a different shop?
 
The problem is that people are trying to use common sense and show the RCMP firearms lab that if these two firearms are nearly identical in form and function that they should both have the same classification. The problem is that the firearms lab has about as much common sense and rational thinking capability as an angry woman in the middle of a divorce does. These people don't realize that they are throwing the new rifle under the AR-15 bus and hoping they both come out the back as non restricted, what is far more likely to happen and what most of us already understand is that both rifles are going to come out the back as restricted and there would really be nothing we can do to go back to just one being restricted.

People, stop thinking with common sense when trying to explain the firearms lab decisions, they are Lieberal so they aren't capable of rational thought.



On this site we all take a turns being the one someone thinks of that way, even you bud.

People think variant is only mechanical. Timelines and lineage go one way. Family trees ideally are not a straight line.
 
Mine will be broken in at my favorite (here) sandpit out near the Smoky River.

A nice hour trek through the forest to shooting Nirvana!

SFRC just has to ship the damn thing. Cases of ammo waiting.
 
DPMS mags don't work? Strange as they were designed to be compatible with original AR10 waffle mags.

Still early but I'd be interested to know if any original style mags work. That is AR-10 waffle mags, KAC SR25 mags, Brownells 308 AR mags etc...

It's supposed to based on an AR102 and now it sounds like an actual AR102 mag won't work or is this strictly the DPMS version?
 
Back
Top Bottom