Seriously! What the hell are all these people doing? I need to live vicariously dammit!
Must have only been that one person in Canada to get one so far, strange...
Seriously! What the hell are all these people doing? I need to live vicariously dammit!
If it is a Milspec buffer tube, then you you can put another milspec butt stock on it, even with the added lenght
If it is longer than milspec... It isn't milspec.
While it's been asked, and people keep saying it is milspec, but longer, I'd love to know exactly what the length is vs a standard 308 buffer tube. I'm looking at a specific stock option, and the extension length is a go^nogo concern.
Its a standard AR10 buffer tube. So not an AR15 buffer tube like the AR308 rifles use. They aren't as common, but are found easily enough.
https://forum.308ar.com/topic/10133-buffers-receiver-extensions-stocks-and-springs/
So no magpul stocks then? I don't see any 308 milspec options on their site. I was really hoping to put some OD furniture on my black 102.![]()
I understand that, what i dont understand, is certain members here are trying VERY hard to link the NEA102 to the AR15...are these people trying to get RCMP's opinion of NR overturned? To what end are they continually coming out with "well, duuh, i just dont see a difference between the 102 and an AR15...deerp"
afer many years I have come to a conclusion, it is simple, really. lots of retards here
I don't want to see range reports, I wanna see people shooting from their backyards (if big enough) or out in the back 40... where this baby belongs.
The problem is that people are trying to use common sense and show the RCMP firearms lab that if these two firearms are nearly identical in form and function that they should both have the same classification. The problem is that the firearms lab has about as much common sense and rational thinking capability as an angry woman in the middle of a divorce does. These people don't realize that they are throwing the new rifle under the AR-15 bus and hoping they both come out the back as non restricted, what is far more likely to happen and what most of us already understand is that both rifles are going to come out the back as restricted and there would really be nothing we can do to go back to just one being restricted.
People, stop thinking with common sense when trying to explain the firearms lab decisions, they are Lieberal so they aren't capable of rational thought.
On this site we all take a turns being the one someone thinks of that way, even you bud.
Its a standard AR10 buffer tube. So not an AR15 buffer tube like the AR308 rifles use. They aren't as common, but are found easily enough.
https://forum.308ar.com/topic/10133-buffers-receiver-extensions-stocks-and-springs/
But do the NEA25 and the NEA102 share the same tube? That's what I really need to know.
But do the NEA25 and the NEA102 share the same tube? That's what I really need to know.
Good question, I don't know. A quick email to NEA would likely answer that question.