NEW NR BLACK RIFLE - Maccabee Defense SLR

Status
Not open for further replies.
I get they'll have costs to cover, but if this is nearing 3000$ the only one they're competing with is ATRS, and I doubt the modern varmits are flying off the shelves. And with NEA/BCL building an AR10 for under 2000$, with fewer 'off the shelf' parts... I dunno. It doesn't need to have match grade DMR parts either. Throw on a cheap standard barrel, BCG, milspec trigger, cheap adjustable stock, nothing fancy, it'll sell like hotcakes. Everyone modifies their rifles anyway. Most of us have parts just laying around collecting dust.

Just sell us a honda civic, let us make them as fast and furious as we want later.
 
Jonesyatpl said:
An upper and lower, without even a parts kit, for $1000 is ludicrous......
Click to expand...
It's actually a steal. Stick to your chinese garbage, comrade.

When ever I think of diving back into the Canadian firearms market and manufacturing guns, I just turn to CGN to be reminded how absolutely awful Canadian gun owners are. I truly do distain most of you so much.
 
Last edited:
DVX said:
So after conversing with the husband of a family friend vising who happens to be a queens cowboy in New Brunswick (Not a patrol guy, but a suit and tie bureaucrat), they are APPARENTLY putting together a dossier on all these new AR style....So my only advise is, KEEP BUYING THESE TYPES OF RIFLES! The current way of thinking (at least the cowboy I talked with) is, they want to get the law changed before "too many" get into the open market. What ever the hell that means, but it gave me motivation to drop some dough on a BCL. Just waiting for the green light from the wife ;)
Click to expand...

I kept saying this but it was far more ghetto chic to drive prices up. More rifles, at better prices, the harder it is for the bureau-rats to move on us. It isn't rocket science but we have egos over the obvious.
 
Jon. said:
I get they'll have costs to cover, but if this is nearing 3000$ the only one they're competing with is ATRS, and I doubt the modern varmits are flying off the shelves. And with NEA/BCL building an AR10 for under 2000$, with fewer 'off the shelf' parts... I dunno. It doesn't need to have match grade DMR parts either. Throw on a cheap standard barrel, BCG, milspec trigger, cheap adjustable stock, nothing fancy, it'll sell like hotcakes. Everyone modifies their rifles anyway. Most of us have parts just laying around collecting dust.

Just sell us a honda civic, let us make them as fast and furious as we want later.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure. A "match chamber", if that is indeed what it is, really doesn't need to be in the BCL. But the other items in bold, are there. Seems to be what any gripes are about the BCL, when they come up, as well as all the questions as to why people are changing out parts.

So with the exception of the "match chamber", you are almost perfectly describing the BCL. And others are also saying basically the same as yourself. So I think it would be reasonable to think that is has to come in well under the BCL price point, to be the "sell like hotcakes" winner of the day.

Or as others have suggested, stripped receivers and uppers containing proprietary parts, only. And seeing where that price point falls in.

Hats off to the innovators and thinkers trying to bring new things to market. Judging by this and the "Canadian NR Black Rifle" thread, there is a window where a manufacturer will be able to hit the mark, to figuratively "print money" with a runaway success.

Seems there are a few irons in the fire right now. Hopefully one nails that window of opportunity.
 
The RCMP keeping a dossier and allowing black rifles to get nr status could backfire on them as well. They could come up with a list of them and it could be argued in return that look at how many ar style rifles are nr with no harm to public safety so why not leave them nr and nr the ar 15.
 
Dr. Hunter said:
The RCMP keeping a dossier and allowing black rifles to get nr status could backfire on them as well. They could come up with a list of them and it could be argued in return that look at how many ar style rifles are nr with no harm to public safety so why not leave them nr and nr the ar 15.
Click to expand...

lol you have the right to keep dreaming .... "but here in the real world, that means nothing at all" - Alan Jackson
 
Dr. Hunter said:
The RCMP keeping a dossier and allowing black rifles to get nr status could backfire on them as well. They could come up with a list of them and it could be argued in return that look at how many ar style rifles are nr with no harm to public safety so why not leave them nr and nr the ar 15.
Click to expand...

Well, the AR-15 rifles currently in Canada have never once been used in any shootings (AFAIK), but it's still classified as restricted. And yet, the rifle that was used to trigger that classification, is still NR.

Things don't need to "make sense" when it comes to gun laws in Canada.. They just, "are".. ;)
 
Armedsask said:
It's actually a steal. Stick to your chinese garbage, comrade.

When ever I think of diving back into the Canadian firearms market and manufacturing guns, I just turn to CGN to be reminded how absolutely awful Canadian gun owners are. I truly do distain most of you so much.
Click to expand...

If that sort of thinking is how you run your businesses; then GOOD, you can STAY OUT of the firearm industry.
 
Does anyone have confirmation the will be selling stripped receiver sets? I would be very interested in this as I was going to build a long range AR15 anyways. The BCL 102 and ATRS only come as complete rifles and I don't want to have to buy the whole thing and remover unwanted parts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom