How about the removable GL.... The t81 dont have that. Pretty darn handy feature if you ask this guy!
Shame you guys in the US can't get REAL AKs, just sloppy, cottage industry attempts, Bulgarian imitations or welded together scrap guns.
How about the removable GL.... The t81 dont have that. Pretty darn handy feature if you ask this guy!
I am almost ready to call the rear sight bar only purpose as just a protector to keep the sight from getting polished up and shining.
Shame you guys in the US can't get REAL AKs, just sloppy, cottage industry attempts, Bulgarian imitations or welded together scrap guns.
What if you shot the rifle sideways...like a gangster, then the rear sight would have an elevation component to it.
Ur starting to sound jeleous now loose cannon.
What if you shot the rifle sideways...like a gangster, then the rear sight would have an elevation component to it.
The T81 was basically an obsolete firearm everywhere but China and some small terrorist nations even before it was issued. It does not improve on the AK in any way, shape, or form. It's design was a little bit interesting being that they used what they had (SKS & AK tooling) out of necessity, due to being poor as ####. They were probably able to make the T81 cheaper then an AK and that was the sole goal and benefit to the Chinese....which is all that mattered at the time.
Laff... Your lies are old and you tell them badly.
The AK I posted is 100% matching numbers military minus the receiver..... Which is MILLED btw. Exactly as the original. No welding thank you.
What if you shot the rifle sideways...like a gangster, then the rear sight would have an elevation component to it.
The T81 was basically an obsolete firearm everywhere but China and some small terrorist nations even before it was issued. It does not improve on the AK in any way, shape, or form. It's design was a little bit interesting being that they used what they had (SKS & AK tooling) out of necessity, due to being poor as ####. They were probably able to make the T81 cheaper then an AK and that was the sole goal and benefit to the Chinese....which is all that mattered at the time.
Before I forget. Did I mention the plethora of ambidextrous thumb selectors for the AK? Plug/play for maybe $15.
but if the gun were conceiver today, it would have a very different ergonomic layout
That may change with time.
922r compliant.... Uh, then chop your sks barrel to 16" and put a 30 round magazine in the damn thing. Wait..... You say you have your own version of restrictions?? I see
I already told you, not all AKs are built here on US receivers. Mack90, Veper, Saiga etc...
Your problem is, you think for some reason Americans are unable to create an identical receiver. Don't be an ant-American poopy pants.
922r compliant.... Uh, then chop your sks barrel to 16" and put a 30 round magazine in the damn thing. Wait..... You say you have your own version of restrictions?? I see
I already told you, not all AKs are built here on US receivers. Mack90, Veper, Saiga etc...
Your problem is, you think for some reason Americans are unable to create an identical receiver. Don't be an ant-American poopy pants.