Why? There have been like ZERO reloading problems in Canada.
The list of things that someone in govt would like to see banned although it doesn't create any problem is endless.
@OP: You're right. Legally, 3.95-1-b) applies to you. In theory, you would have to make sure that you're not keeping more than 5kg (11lbs) of powder (total, including what's in every one of your cartridge) if one of your container contains more than 1kg (2.2lbs). It really is not much tbh.
If someone bought a lot of commercial ammos, they could go over the 20kg limit without even knowing they do. Granted, 20kg of powder in loaded ammos is a lot, but with large lots of milsurp it would be possible to store that much in an apartment I believe, and nobody knows how much powder there is in each of those 60 years old cartridges.
In theory, woodchopper's idea of using old powder bottles doesn't work. The wording is pretty specific, "in its original container", meaning the container the powder originally came from. I'd like to see 2 lawyers argue in front of a judge whether "a container originally meant for that specific kind of powder" (e.g. 8lbs of titegroup stored into 8 titegroup bottles of 1lb each instead of the 8lbs container that Hodgdons packaged it in) is an original container, or if it is necessary to be in the container originally meant for that specific pound of powder. Some lawyers would have a kick out of that. Poor judge would get a headache.


















































