So as I understand it after speaking with a Justice of the peace. (And this is just my understanding) The main problem is that there is no definition stated anywhere in the regulation as to how to properly manage bore size. Because this is very ambiguous on the wording of this new OIC, it’s valid to take this issue to A judge where they will be given the choice of creating a definition or passing it up the ladder to the next level court of appeals.
A judge will have to look at existing case law, guidance from similar laws and laws and documents from this country and others for Clarity. I imagine the forensic standard will play a large part in it, as will the definition of barrel length in the Firearms Act. At which point somewhere a judge will make a ruling and then what ever party is not content will push it up all the way to the superior court of appeals.
It really does not matter at all what Bill Blare, The PM, or the RCMP say. The OIC has made this law based on the wording they provided. Which we all know says if the bore is larger then 20mm it creates a prohibited firearm. Their is also a legal argument to be made that this goes against our chartered rights.
What has absolutely blown me away is the amount of firearms owners who have just turned their back on those effected by this new ban. Some where along the line they forgot that this effects all of us. A ban on AR’s is going to take a major hit out of firearms shops and websites, possibly causing layoffs, closing of factories and the companies that build these products.
For *^%€ sakes. Stop thinking about your selves and think about the larger picture here and all the people that will be hit by a law that is full of issues and was forced through with out democratic due process.