Trudeau and Blair BAN 12 Gauge and 10 Gauge SHOTGUNS!

A_Modest_Proposal said:
"Brass is made by RMC. They are $10 a pop" - Richard f
commercial primers.
commercial powder
commercial projectile.

I believe that qualifies. Though you could go back to before you piped up and read where I stated that the round was not an over the counter purchase.
Your argument is now close to approaching the equivalent of "purchasing the parts to make a prohibited firearm makes it not prohibited due to the necessity of assembly".
I don't have any intent to email Blair anything, he won't determine if the charges stick.
Never the less I don't need to keep doing the easy research for you, snowflake.
Click to expand...

Maybe instead of calling me a snowflake and a Liberal, you actually re-read my posts in the context of asking for proof to back up a claim.

It only took you what, 12 posts back and forth with me to post a video to prove what you were claiming? That’s all I asked for. It’s sad you consider that a Liberal tactic- as I believe they don’t care about truth or facts.

You do need to pull back the reigns on stating all shotguns are now banned because of this. So far that evidence does Not exist. The fact some break action or bolt action shotguns might produce the energy required to ban them, doesn’t mean the rest do- not without testing.

Keep your claims to within what you can prove. That’s the opposite of what the Liberals do.
 
A_Modest_Proposal said:
The OiC is almost too malicious to be born of ignorance. Banning anti-material rifles that would only be useful in countering an oppressive regime, and not in any way preventing civilian criminal activities, doesn't appear to be of interest to public safety... Don your tin foil hats! :stirthepot2:
Click to expand...

This is an important point that many people are missing.

The government of C(hina)anada does not want its citizens in possession of firearms that may be used against an oppressive regime.

To my knowledge, a .50bmg has never been used in a crime in North America. There is no good reason to ban it, other than the above.
 
Upon further reflection, shouldn't we be looking at the muzzle energy of proof rounds for each cartridge? The only point of those rounds existing is testing if a firearm can shoot them, so it should fall within the purview of the new muzzle energy limits...
 
Bfranklin said:
This is an important point that many people are missing.

The government of C(hina)anada does not want its citizens in possession of firearms that may be used against an oppressive regime.

To my knowledge, a .50bmg has never been used in a crime in North America. There is no good reason to ban it, other than the above.
Click to expand...

Well, there was a .50BMG used in Montreal back in the mid-seventies to rob an armoured car crew....
http://https://archive.macleans.ca/article/1976/4/19/the-great-truck-robbery

Rob
 
Last edited:
There's also evidence that back before that, stones and sticks were used to kill, better outlaw those too. Oh wait even better, prohibit trees and the earth!!!
 
What I picture when I read some of these comments.


3kyfn6.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom