Patt08
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
Exactly.
Maccabee SLR classification
- Thread starter RaTFiNk306
- Start date
Exactly.
How can they inspect it and issue a FRT which says it's not a variant of the AR-15 and then pull a 180° and say it now is a variant?
Because tyranny, that's how.
84wh1
CGN Ultra frequent flyer
I believe portions of C71 gave them this power.
Sure, the old 'oh we discovered that' has *some* logical basis...
But in this case, what information/proof can they produce that made them change their 'expert' opinions on this?
That's the real question and I believe we have the right to know.
If it has a 473mm barrel, it's still non restricted.
If I’m not mistaken companies like BCL/NEA, Maccabee, & ATRS worked under the guidance of the RCMP so that their designs would not be classified as “variants” of existing restricted or prohibited firearms. I’m not a legal expert, but there MUST be grounds for a lawsuit here. How can the RCMP provide guidance to these manufacturers who spent untold amounts of money designing and manufacturing firearms that RCMP approved as Non-restricted and not variants, only to later arbitrarily reclassify them as variants? How can that be legal?!?!?
Also, how can they classify the Typhoon as an AR variant when the operating mechanisms are completely different and not one single part is interchangeable? This insanity MUST be challenged legally!
This is peak clown world...
Also, how can they classify the Typhoon as an AR variant when the operating mechanisms are completely different and not one single part is interchangeable? This insanity MUST be challenged legally!
This is peak clown world...
crasheralex
Regular
- Location
- Cambridge, On
The FRT is worth less than the paper its written on. It is not law and should be ignored. Someone is making things up to push an agenda in the middle of the night. Do not comply. Do not give in. Do not surrender anything.
They didn't work "under the guidance of the RCMP". They submitted an example and it was either approved or not. The RCMP then made comments on the FRT report to back up their reasoning(s) for the classification. The RCMP didn't tell them how to design anything. They simply made a decision based on current law.
If the example submitted didn't get the manufacturers desired classification they went back to the drawing board and tried again.
There was no help or guidance from the RCMP in regards to how to design the product.
You can watch this and replace "ar15" with anything else and this will still be true. And most importantly remember... registration leads to confiscation.
Last edited:
Really?
