Famous Single Shot Hunting Rifles

There is also the brno k1.I know of a mannlicher stocked one in 308 that tempts me everytime I see it at the store

I had one of these in 243.

It shot very well, but had issues with the extractor. I was impatient after waiting for months to get it fixed and the dealer was nice enough to give me store credit.

Regret letting that one go, it was a very nice rifle.
 
Have yet to find my single shot.

1. A few years ago, I had a Ruger No. 1 International fullstock in 30-06. It felt heavy and awkward. It wasn't the actual weight but the balance that seemed all wrong. Also, for some reason it really belted me with recoil....buttstock design?..anyway, I didn't like it and moved it on down the line. Maybe a lighter calibre would have been better.

2. Saw and handled a nice old minty (exc. bore) Farquharson in .303 British at the last big spring Calgary Gun Show, just before it opened for the first day. I asked how much, and the reply was a firm "Fourteen-Five"($14,500.) I went back to my table to get my son to show it to him. By the time we got back, it was gone. "Sold." All before the show opened.

3. Modern Dakota rifles are very well made. The Model 10 fullstock could be nice in .303. The base model starts around around $9500.(Can.) plus tax. and there are plenty of upgrade options.

https://www.dakotaarms.com/firearms/...annlicher.html

Qtes7pV.png
 
Last edited:
I'm sure they make a few versions...seem to be lots of upgrades to choose from.

It would be nice if they did a scalloped taper at the rear to give it a graceful flow... or reduce the height to blend better with the receiver, there is more than enough meat to take it down some.
 
I find the Ruger #1 and #3 balance strange. Hagn actions very nice, Martini-Enfield nice but quite clunky, Westley Richards very nice but a touch gangly. My favorite thus far is the Savage 219 but it's rough as guts and not very strong; it's more of a tesching. I would like to see the 219 with a hair trigger.
 
It would be nice if they did a scalloped taper at the rear to give it a graceful flow... or reduce the height to blend better with the receiver, there is more than enough meat to take it down some.

It’s there to mount the ring where it should be mounted. That’s one thing ruger should have changed 40 years ago.
 
It’s there to mount the ring where it should be mounted. That’s one thing ruger should have changed 40 years ago.

I get that, but it could be a lot leaner than it is... with the thickness and squared off rear, it looks very blocky on an otherwise nice rifle. They could also mill a continuation onto the front of the reciver and have the quarter rib flow into that... it would really streamline the design. Shooters could then choose their ring height based on their needs.
 
I have always liked the Ruger #1. Have owned and hunted 8 or 9 different #1 chamberings.
Right now, my latest acquisition is a #1B, originally a 30-06, but rechambered to my favorite 30
cal Magnum, the 308 Norma Mag.

Shot a moose with it last fall, and will probably pack it for moose again this fall. It shoots the 210
LRAB into nice tight groups, and that 26" barrel delivers the velocity.

However, many opt for much pricier and prettier single shot rifles, and that is fine. The #1 is a good,
solid firearm at an affordable price. Dave.
 
Have yet to find my single shot.

1. A few years ago, I had a Ruger No. 1 International fullstock in 30-06. It felt heavy and awkward. It wasn't the actual weight but the balance that seemed all wrong. Also, for some reason it really belted me with recoil....buttstock design?..anyway, I didn't like it and moved it on down the line. Maybe a lighter calibre would have been better.

2. Saw and handled a nice old minty (exc. bore) Farquharson in .303 British at the last big spring Calgary Gun Show, just before it opened for the first day. I asked how much, and the reply was a firm "Fourteen-Five"($14,500.) I went back to my table to get my son to show it to him. By the time we got back, it was gone. "Sold." All before the show opened.

3. Modern Dakota rifles are very well made. The Model 10 fullstock could be nice in .303. The base model starts around around $9500.(Can.) plus tax. and there are plenty of upgrade options.

https://www.dakotaarms.com/firearms/...annlicher.html

Qtes7pV.png

I didn't know about Dakota Arms. I may have to look into these. I'd love a Merkel or Blaser, but having something that pretty built so close to home is pretty cool.
 
The original working model for the Farquharson single shot action was carved by Scottish game keeper John Farquharson, from a turnip.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom