Accuracy is my goal. I like to shoot. Accurately.
And you're currently not hitting your intended target? I thought it was your precision that was suffering?
Accuracy is my goal. I like to shoot. Accurately.
^Hornady original offering for the 6.5 creed was with the Hornady 120 and the 140.
Their ammo box has at the back, the duplication data to handload it.
That data used Varget. The 120 was accurate as the 140.
I am sure if you do a search, it can be tracked back. Thats what I was using when the 6.5 CM was introduced.
There is now great loads - bullets combination, but those Hornady load work.
Might have to give varget a try if my new loads dont work out. Good thing I bought the extra can of H4350 lol
This guy wouldn't.I wouldn’t.
And you're currently not hitting your intended target? I thought it was your precision that was suffering?
Your "help" has this negative condescending feel to it.
Are you trying to help? Are you trying to be funny?
I'm trying to shrink my group sizes. I figured that was obvious. I have made new loads to try. If that doesn't work then either I need a new bullet or a new powder. So far only one powder has been suggested. And a few expensive bullets.
My goal here is to make loads that shoot as tight as possible. I thought H4350 was the go to powder for this caliber. Maybe my rifle would prefer another.
Your "help" has this negative condescending feel to it.
Are you trying to help? Are you trying to be funny?
I haven't seen anything helpful from him. Don't forget to dot your i
Don't want to hijack the thread but I had a little incident today with a 120 gr. over 39.5 IMR 4895 as per nosler's web site data in my creedmoor.
I would sure like to know what quickload calculates for pressure with this load.
Cartridge : 6.5 Creedmoor Hornady
Bullet : .264, 120, Hornady ELD-M 26175
Useable Case Capaci: 47.953 grain H2O = 3.114 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm
Barrel Length : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm
Powder : IMR 4895
Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !
Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms
-10.0 80 35.55 2672 1902 48902 9626 98.9 1.162
-09.0 81 35.95 2697 1938 50111 9712 99.1 1.150
-08.0 82 36.34 2722 1975 51353 9796 99.3 1.139
-07.0 83 36.74 2747 2011 52628 9877 99.4 1.127
-06.0 84 37.13 2772 2048 53938 9956 99.6 1.116
-05.0 85 37.53 2797 2084 55282 10031 99.7 1.105 ! Near Maximum !
-04.0 86 37.92 2822 2121 56662 10104 99.8 1.094 ! Near Maximum !
-03.0 87 38.32 2846 2159 58079 10174 99.8 1.083 ! Near Maximum !
-02.0 88 38.71 2871 2196 59534 10240 99.9 1.072 ! Near Maximum !
-01.0 88 39.11 2895 2233 61028 10304 100.0 1.061 ! Near Maximum !
[B]+00.0 89 39.50 2919 2271 62562 10365 100.0 1.051 ! Near Maximum ![/B]
+01.0 90 39.90 2944 2309 64137 10422 100.0 1.040 ! Near Maximum !
+02.0 91 40.29 2968 2347 65754 10477 100.0 1.030 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0 92 40.69 2992 2385 67416 10531 100.0 1.020 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0 93 41.08 3016 2423 69122 10584 100.0 1.010 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0 94 41.48 3039 2462 70875 10637 100.0 1.000 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
[COLOR=#ff0000][B]Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge[/B][/COLOR]
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 89 39.50 3016 2423 71793 10009 100.0 1.001 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 89 39.50 2781 2060 53487 10474 97.5 1.113
Code:Cartridge : 6.5 Creedmoor Hornady Bullet : .264, 120, Hornady ELD-M 26175 Useable Case Capaci: 47.953 grain H2O = 3.114 cm³ Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm Barrel Length : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm Powder : IMR 4895 Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge, incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge. CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads ! Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time % % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms -10.0 80 35.55 2672 1902 48902 9626 98.9 1.162 -09.0 81 35.95 2697 1938 50111 9712 99.1 1.150 -08.0 82 36.34 2722 1975 51353 9796 99.3 1.139 -07.0 83 36.74 2747 2011 52628 9877 99.4 1.127 -06.0 84 37.13 2772 2048 53938 9956 99.6 1.116 -05.0 85 37.53 2797 2084 55282 10031 99.7 1.105 ! Near Maximum ! -04.0 86 37.92 2822 2121 56662 10104 99.8 1.094 ! Near Maximum ! -03.0 87 38.32 2846 2159 58079 10174 99.8 1.083 ! Near Maximum ! -02.0 88 38.71 2871 2196 59534 10240 99.9 1.072 ! Near Maximum ! -01.0 88 39.11 2895 2233 61028 10304 100.0 1.061 ! Near Maximum ! [B]+00.0 89 39.50 2919 2271 62562 10365 100.0 1.051 ! Near Maximum ![/B] +01.0 90 39.90 2944 2309 64137 10422 100.0 1.040 ! Near Maximum ! +02.0 91 40.29 2968 2347 65754 10477 100.0 1.030 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! +03.0 92 40.69 2992 2385 67416 10531 100.0 1.020 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! +04.0 93 41.08 3016 2423 69122 10584 100.0 1.010 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! +05.0 94 41.48 3039 2462 70875 10637 100.0 1.000 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! [COLOR=#ff0000][B]Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge[/B][/COLOR] Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value: +Ba 89 39.50 3016 2423 71793 10009 100.0 1.001 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE! Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value: -Ba 89 39.50 2781 2060 53487 10474 97.5 1.113
There's some details I'd need for a better prediction on PSI, but this should be close for most jacketed lead core bullets. A monometal would be much higher PSI. Did you chronograph it? Any pressure signs from a lower charge weight?
Looking for the 6.5 CM load data on Alliant web site - RL17 loads data for that caliber do not exist.
So you are in uncharted territory. It mean they do not recommend RL17 for that caliber - due to a varieties of reasons.
Alliant data for the 6.5 CM is with RL16 not RL17.
Before going to 41.2 - did you work up to it ? In my book there is no calculated pressure data that hold to reality.
Powder and bullet manufacturer data IS the only lab tested data that stand on it’s legs.
shooting with a chronograph to measure velocity?




























