6.5 Creed with 120 grain pills and H4350

Hornady original offering for the 6.5 creed was with the Hornady 120 and the 140.
Their ammo box has at the back, the duplication data to handload it.
That data used Varget. The 120 was accurate as the 140.

I am sure if you do a search, it can be tracked back. Thats what I was using when the 6.5 CM was introduced.

There is now great loads - bullets combination, but those Hornady load work.
^

Might have to give varget a try if my new loads dont work out. Good thing I bought the extra can of H4350 lol
I wouldn’t.
This guy wouldn't.
 
I'm trying to shrink my group sizes. I figured that was obvious. I have made new loads to try. If that doesn't work then either I need a new bullet or a new powder. So far only one powder has been suggested. And a few expensive bullets.
My goal here is to make loads that shoot as tight as possible. I thought H4350 was the go to powder for this caliber. Maybe my rifle would prefer another.
 
I'm trying to shrink my group sizes. I figured that was obvious. I have made new loads to try. If that doesn't work then either I need a new bullet or a new powder. So far only one powder has been suggested. And a few expensive bullets.
My goal here is to make loads that shoot as tight as possible. I thought H4350 was the go to powder for this caliber. Maybe my rifle would prefer another.

So now TOKAY444 will tell you that Precision is what you are talking about. More important than that though I think is to clearly define how it will be used. Tight groups really is not enough information. Tight groups for 100m Benchrest may or may not be usefull at a 1000yds. So I think folks are asking to be specific about your usage. For instance if some one tells me they want a load for competition in PRS(Ironically named I guess) in Eastern Canada then there are distance requirements to be met and then limitations on both bullet weight and velocity for some of the Usable Ranges. Or I want to shoot F Class Open, then this too sets the rules of the game with respect to equipment and precision to be considered enough.

A certain level of precision is relatively easy to achieve, but as we go down the rapid hole in gets exponentially more difficult and expensive.

Without a clear destination we dont know when we have arrived.
 
I target shoot. I shoot for fun. I'm not in any competitive rifle sport. I have 4 kids ages 5 to 9. I don't have a ton of time so my load development tends to be slow. This is my hobby. I shoot when I can. My local range has only 100 yards. I like to shoot farther. I have in the past. I seldom do now. I dont have any place to go unless I drive 30 minutes to crown land. I dont take the time for that very often.
 
I haven't seen anything helpful from him. Don't forget to dot your i

No? The first to say try Varget behind the 120s?
Listing the most popular bullet selection for precision shooting in 6.5creed?
Op, as Longbow defined, you're looking for better precision, which is what I thought.
How long is your barrel? I'm sure it was mentioned.
Since you're probably not looking to change to a much slower twist barrel and run flat based light for caliber bullets, as is common in 100 yard group shooting, my recommendation is 40.6-43.0gr of H4350 (which you already have) in .3gr increments and run Berger 140 Hybrids .080" off the lands shooting for 2720-2750 or 2820-2850 fps. You can even try dropping into one of these speed ranges with the 120 ELDMs, but I don't have and personal experience with them.
 
Don't want to hijack the thread but I had a little incident today with a 120 gr. over 39.5 IMR 4895 as per nosler's web site data in my creedmoor.

I would sure like to know what quickload calculates for pressure with this load.

New rifle, less than 80 rounds down it and has been to published max loads with RL19,17 and H and IMR 4350 120/140loads without incident.
 
Don't want to hijack the thread but I had a little incident today with a 120 gr. over 39.5 IMR 4895 as per nosler's web site data in my creedmoor.

I would sure like to know what quickload calculates for pressure with this load.

Code:
Cartridge          : 6.5 Creedmoor Hornady
Bullet             : .264, 120, Hornady ELD-M 26175
Useable Case Capaci: 47.953 grain H2O = 3.114 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm
Barrel Length      : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm
Powder             : IMR 4895

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-10.0   80    35.55   2672    1902   48902   9626     98.9    1.162
-09.0   81    35.95   2697    1938   50111   9712     99.1    1.150
-08.0   82    36.34   2722    1975   51353   9796     99.3    1.139
-07.0   83    36.74   2747    2011   52628   9877     99.4    1.127
-06.0   84    37.13   2772    2048   53938   9956     99.6    1.116
-05.0   85    37.53   2797    2084   55282  10031     99.7    1.105  ! Near Maximum !
-04.0   86    37.92   2822    2121   56662  10104     99.8    1.094  ! Near Maximum !
-03.0   87    38.32   2846    2159   58079  10174     99.8    1.083  ! Near Maximum !
-02.0   88    38.71   2871    2196   59534  10240     99.9    1.072  ! Near Maximum !
-01.0   88    39.11   2895    2233   61028  10304    100.0    1.061  ! Near Maximum !
[B]+00.0   89    39.50   2919    2271   62562  10365    100.0    1.051  ! Near Maximum ![/B]
+01.0   90    39.90   2944    2309   64137  10422    100.0    1.040  ! Near Maximum !
+02.0   91    40.29   2968    2347   65754  10477    100.0    1.030  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0   92    40.69   2992    2385   67416  10531    100.0    1.020  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0   93    41.08   3016    2423   69122  10584    100.0    1.010  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0   94    41.48   3039    2462   70875  10637    100.0    1.000  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

[COLOR=#ff0000][B]Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge[/B][/COLOR]
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba     89    39.50   3016    2423   71793  10009    100.0    1.001  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba     89    39.50   2781    2060   53487  10474     97.5    1.113

There's some details I'd need for a better prediction on PSI, but this should be close for most jacketed lead core bullets. A monometal would be much higher PSI. Did you chronograph it? Any pressure signs from a lower charge weight?
 
If you are looking for pure accuracy, try 123gr Lapua Scenar bullets. I've had amazing results in different 6.5 rifles. In the Creedmoor I've used H4350 , Reloder 16 and Reloder 17. My 6.5 Creedmoor Tikka T3X has shot 4 shot groups at the 1/2 inch mark using 129 Interlocks and Scirroco 2s.
 
Code:
Cartridge          : 6.5 Creedmoor Hornady
Bullet             : .264, 120, Hornady ELD-M 26175
Useable Case Capaci: 47.953 grain H2O = 3.114 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm
Barrel Length      : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm
Powder             : IMR 4895

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-10.0   80    35.55   2672    1902   48902   9626     98.9    1.162
-09.0   81    35.95   2697    1938   50111   9712     99.1    1.150
-08.0   82    36.34   2722    1975   51353   9796     99.3    1.139
-07.0   83    36.74   2747    2011   52628   9877     99.4    1.127
-06.0   84    37.13   2772    2048   53938   9956     99.6    1.116
-05.0   85    37.53   2797    2084   55282  10031     99.7    1.105  ! Near Maximum !
-04.0   86    37.92   2822    2121   56662  10104     99.8    1.094  ! Near Maximum !
-03.0   87    38.32   2846    2159   58079  10174     99.8    1.083  ! Near Maximum !
-02.0   88    38.71   2871    2196   59534  10240     99.9    1.072  ! Near Maximum !
-01.0   88    39.11   2895    2233   61028  10304    100.0    1.061  ! Near Maximum !
[B]+00.0   89    39.50   2919    2271   62562  10365    100.0    1.051  ! Near Maximum ![/B]
+01.0   90    39.90   2944    2309   64137  10422    100.0    1.040  ! Near Maximum !
+02.0   91    40.29   2968    2347   65754  10477    100.0    1.030  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0   92    40.69   2992    2385   67416  10531    100.0    1.020  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0   93    41.08   3016    2423   69122  10584    100.0    1.010  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0   94    41.48   3039    2462   70875  10637    100.0    1.000  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

[COLOR=#ff0000][B]Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge[/B][/COLOR]
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba     89    39.50   3016    2423   71793  10009    100.0    1.001  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba     89    39.50   2781    2060   53487  10474     97.5    1.113

There's some details I'd need for a better prediction on PSI, but this should be close for most jacketed lead core bullets. A monometal would be much higher PSI. Did you chronograph it? Any pressure signs from a lower charge weight?

Thank you for this Mark,

The bullet used was a speer 120 gr gold dot, starline new case run through the sizing die and federal 210 primer, The rifle has 70-80 rounds down the tube and the bullet was .050 off the lands. I just got back from the range here after firing two rounds with a speer 140 hot cor over 41.2 RL17 and just got stiff bolt lift and plunger marks on the brass. I'm

going to send an email to MD charlton and go pull some bullets.
 
Looking for the 6.5 CM load data on Alliant web site - RL17 loads data for that caliber do not exist.
So you are in uncharted territory. It mean they do not recommend RL17 for that caliber - due to a varieties of reasons.

Alliant data for the 6.5 CM is with RL16 not RL17.

Before going to 41.2 - did you work up to it ? In my book there is no calculated pressure data that hold to reality.
Powder and bullet manufacturer data IS the only lab tested data that stand on it’s legs.
 
Last edited:
Looking for the 6.5 CM load data on Alliant web site - RL17 loads data for that caliber do not exist.
So you are in uncharted territory. It mean they do not recommend RL17 for that caliber - due to a varieties of reasons.

Alliant data for the 6.5 CM is with RL16 not RL17.

Before going to 41.2 - did you work up to it ? In my book there is no calculated pressure data that hold to reality.
Powder and bullet manufacturer data IS the only lab tested data that stand on it’s legs.

They may not show it now but the paper with the Alliant Powder logo and Alliant 6.5 creedmoor loads I printed off some time ago shows a 140gr speer spitzer @ 2.760 Coal , CCI 200 in a hornady case @ 41.8 and 2765 fps.

Did I work up to it, yes from 40.0 in .4gr increments and just shot the 40.8 grs yesterday with no pressure signs at all. 41.2 got me some bright double plunger marks and a stiff bolt handle. Is it my first rodeo? no
 
RJ how far off the lands are you? Pressure can really show up fast if you're very close to the lands or even jammed in
 
Back
Top Bottom