Funny how one can discount data and experience just because they don't like it. dismissing is so much easier then actually proving a point.
And it is wonderful how we can extrapolate to any extreme ... cause that is what you must be saying.
Anyone is free to accept or disagree. I just go by what I have seen in my testing over a couple of decades. Believe me or not, will not change my experiences and that typically includes sample sizes far larger then the norm.
my targets seem to agree with me.... as do my scores
I would love to see some internal volume testing of current manf Peterson, Lapua, and Starline brass... vs weight of course.
Doubt that is going to happen....
Jerry
PS... you know the alloys are different when you trash a bunch of brass from the same manf BUT different lot and use a very precise annealer. Number of firings can also have an affect vs others from the same lot... but let's step away from real world testing. Far better to 'suppose'
You are funny Jerry
You speak as though you are the only person on the internet who has been doing this for a long time. It's as though you are assuming the points I've made are theoretical and have not been proven.
As for imperial evidence, I don't need to provide any. That is entirely up to you, but you wont do it simply because it conflicts with your personal bias.