I was wondering what was going on when this reviewer (sootch00) had already reviewed the "Crusader Arms Templar" 6 months ago (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnVYCxxV-9M ), it seems from the review that the "Cru Arms Temp 556" is what Crusader Arms had to rename the rifle (and the operating company) for the American market due to existing companies and product names in the US.
Glad that it's getting reviewed. It's really only a niche gun in the US market - there are so many cheaper, and/or better-made rifles in the US that fire 5.56mm, and even if you specifically wanted the AR-180 platform for whatever reason, the Brownells BRN-180 upper is ~$900 USD, and a lot more customizable options for the lower. As someone pointed out in a Reddit thread (and Administrative Results it seems as well) , the CruArms Temp is like a "hipster gun" for people who want something LIKE an ACR/SCAR/MCX but don't want to pay SCAR prices. I like my Crusader 9, don't get me wrong, but it's one of a dozen or so 5.56mm SA option we have, practically speaking, in Canada. When you have a lot more to choose from, it's harder to stand out.
I enjoy this rifle; I've had a lot of fun shooting it, but I'm under no illusions that it is of the same quality or will ultimately likely have the same longevity as a Tavor X95, Bren 2 or APC 556. It's made for a certain price point and can exist in the confined ecosystem of the Canadian rifle market for very specific reasons. As someone who likes variety and diversity, I don't mind that it isn't a AR15-derived system, and I like the look of it.